Sadly, Thomas Sowell is an ardent admirer of our global war on terrorism, occupation of Iraq, and a Fred Thompson supporter.

What book is he referring to exactly? The reviewer never mentions the title.

BTW, I don’t think Sowell admires the occupation of Iraq or the global war on terrorism:

(from “Dangers Ahead—From the Right”):

While the left has done enormous damage to the security of the United States, the political right is not without its problems. Those neoconservatives, especially, who were pushing an activist “national greatness” foreign policy, even before September 11th, have seized upon that event as a reason for the United States to “use American might to promote American ideals” around the world.

That phrase, by Max Boot of the Counsel on Foreign Relations and The Weekly Standard, is breathtaking in its implications. When he places himself and fellow neoconservatives in the tradition of Woodrow Wilson, it is truly chilling.

[...]

The track record of nation-building and Wilsonian grandiosity ought to give anyone pause. The very idea that young Americans are once again to be sent out to be shot at and killed, in order to carry out the bright ideas of editorial office heroes, is sickening.

(from “Mugged by reality, Part III”):

If nothing else comes out of the Iraq war, it should banish the concept of “nation-building” from our language and our minds. “The track record of nation-building and Wilsonian grandiosity ought to give anyone pause,” as was said in this column before the Iraq war began.

We can now add the track record of Iraq to the list of disasters.

He does disagree with Ron Paul’s “just come home” idea, though. However, not wanting to pull the troops out immediately is not the same as “admiring” the occupation.

I’ve always heard that Sowell is a supporter of the war on terror, war on Iraq, etc. But I have never actually seen him quoted saying these things. The most I have seen from him is a few disparaging remarks about the left’s attitudes towards terrorism. I am not denying he is pro-war, but does anyone have a quote of him actually saying so?

I have his book “classical economics reconsidered”. it’s very good. It has profiles of JB Say and Adam Smith and talks about how their lives influenced their ideas and the sort of politics they tended to espouse

I bought it last week, about half way through it, it’s fantastic.

癌症 肺癌 胃癌 肝癌 肾癌 食道癌 子宫颈癌 乳腺癌 卵巢癌 直肠癌 结肠癌 皮肤癌 甲状腺癌 胰腺癌 前列腺癌 膀胱癌 骨癌 鼻咽癌 脑瘤 肿瘤 肺癌 胃癌 肝癌 肾癌 食道癌 宫颈癌 乳腺癌 卵巢癌 直肠癌 结肠癌 胰腺癌 甲状腺癌 前列腺癌 贲门癌 膀胱癌 胆囊癌 胆管癌 骨癌 皮肤癌 癌症 肺癌 胃癌 肝癌 食管癌 直肠癌 结肠癌 宫颈癌 乳腺癌 脑瘤 甲状腺肿瘤 胆囊癌 胆管癌 前列腺癌 白血病 鼻咽癌 肾癌 恶性淋巴瘤 皮肤癌 喉癌 舌癌 胰腺癌 膀胱癌 癌症 肺癌 肝癌 胃癌 食道癌 宫颈癌 直肠癌 结肠癌 胰腺癌 乳腺癌 脑瘤 乙肝 肝病 肝炎

A major clue to Mercury’s geologic past came from the scientists’ finding of volcanic vents along the margins of the

Caloris basin, one of the solar system’s largest and youngest impact basins. The group zeroed in on a kidney-shaped

depression that was surrounded by a bright ring, lending a halo-like impression to the landscape.kswchina The scientists determined that the depression was a volcanic vent,and the bright

ring around it was pyroclastic,energy remnants of lava that had been spewed

outward, much like a volcanic fountain on Earth. Another larger ring surrounding the vent and halo ring showed that another

type of volcanism,gongwuyuan called effusion, in which molten rock from within

the planet oozes outward and covers the surface,money had occurred.foreign Together these deposits create a surface feature shaped like a volcanic shield

– a clear sign to scientists that volcanic activity helped form the surrounding plains.