<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stamp Out the Postal Monopoly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.mises.org/6635/stamp-out-the-postal-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.mises.org/6635/stamp-out-the-postal-monopoly/</link>
	<description>Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie G.</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/6635/stamp-out-the-postal-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-499142</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/006635.asp#comment-499142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an archived copy of J.H. Huebert&#039;s op-ed in the Baltimore Sun.
http://www.webcitation.org/5ePpCyV8v]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an archived copy of J.H. Huebert&#8217;s op-ed in the Baltimore Sun.<br />
<a href="http://www.webcitation.org/5ePpCyV8v" rel="nofollow">http://www.webcitation.org/5ePpCyV8v</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/6635/stamp-out-the-postal-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-119191</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/006635.asp#comment-119191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never gonna happen. It&#039;s a God-given right for people in high delivery cost areas to shift their costs onto people in low delivery cost areas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never gonna happen. It&#8217;s a God-given right for people in high delivery cost areas to shift their costs onto people in low delivery cost areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLWP Sam</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/6635/stamp-out-the-postal-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-119135</link>
		<dc:creator>TLWP Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 22:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/006635.asp#comment-119135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I s&#039;pose the obvious alternative to mail is email.  Indeed the delivery efficiency of email is better than mail somuchso I mostly get emails from others I don&#039;t even want. :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I s&#8217;pose the obvious alternative to mail is email.  Indeed the delivery efficiency of email is better than mail somuchso I mostly get emails from others I don&#8217;t even want. <img src='http://archive.mises.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brabson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/6635/stamp-out-the-postal-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-119119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brabson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/006635.asp#comment-119119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fully agree the Postal Service should be privatized, but I think it can and should be done without destroying the postal service.  In transition, the USPS could be totally privatized, eliminating the Postal Service commission, while temporarily retaining the first class monopoly.  During this same time, potential competitors could prepare to enter the first class mail business on the day the monopoly ended.  This period would give the newly privatized company a chance to trim down and shed its current civil service workforce and adopt a privatized workforce structure.  At the end of the interim period, likely two to three years, competitors could enter the business on equal footing with the USPS.

This method would preserve the USPS and avoid the unpleasant possibility of extended postal service disruptions which would likely happen if the Postal Service was cut loose without a chance to trim down.  It also leaves the possibility that Fedex, UPS, DHL and other competitors could divvy up the Postal Service, buying out certain post offices or taking over certain delivery routes.  Fedex could end up with Postal Air routes while UPS ended up with the individual offices.  The possibilities are literally endless.  My personal opinion is that given my scenario, the USPS would likely survice, but might not be present in every city and town as it is now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree the Postal Service should be privatized, but I think it can and should be done without destroying the postal service.  In transition, the USPS could be totally privatized, eliminating the Postal Service commission, while temporarily retaining the first class monopoly.  During this same time, potential competitors could prepare to enter the first class mail business on the day the monopoly ended.  This period would give the newly privatized company a chance to trim down and shed its current civil service workforce and adopt a privatized workforce structure.  At the end of the interim period, likely two to three years, competitors could enter the business on equal footing with the USPS.</p>
<p>This method would preserve the USPS and avoid the unpleasant possibility of extended postal service disruptions which would likely happen if the Postal Service was cut loose without a chance to trim down.  It also leaves the possibility that Fedex, UPS, DHL and other competitors could divvy up the Postal Service, buying out certain post offices or taking over certain delivery routes.  Fedex could end up with Postal Air routes while UPS ended up with the individual offices.  The possibilities are literally endless.  My personal opinion is that given my scenario, the USPS would likely survice, but might not be present in every city and town as it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 336/341 objects using apc

 Served from: archive.mises.org @ 2013-06-18 20:33:32 by W3 Total Cache -->