Maybe cho realized these college children would have grown up to be truly a negative affect on the world at large.
Tell me how different the story would be if we could go back and kill Hitler when he was in college. Do you really believe the media would have patted our man on the back? No! he would be a monster.
I really don’t believe any of these kids were Hitler but what if cho wasn’t too far from the truth.

I don’t know anyone involved, and my point is not to pass judgment on anyone.
All I wish to say is I’m really getting tired of the media and every easily lead moron telling me how to look at things. People, have your opinions and someone will always disagree with whatever your saying.
Stop thinking the way they tell you to…………….. Form your own opinion and don’t have any fear to speak your mind……………..

Remember if you call me names cause you don’t agree with me then you know what started cho….. Maybe your apart of the problem not me

– Tyler Goines
05 01 07

Please, don’t say the government. We all know that isn’t true, and never will be.

Also, what is a politician more worried about: An ordinary citizen dying or a police man dying? One has no clout, the other is a member of a powerful special interest group. If the police had put themselves at risk for the ‘public good’, you know who would be complaining. You can’t keep your job as police commissioner doing what you’re supposedly there to do. Bureaucrats only keep their jobs when politically powerful groups remain happy.

Now if the Governor’s daughter was in danger, would we be having a discussion about gun rights?

Eroded gun rights aren’t as big a problem as the police themselves are.

Okay once again, we have a man with a gun that shot what had appeared to be his girlfriend. Should we alert all of Auburn when a husband kills his wife? Of course not nobody could have guessed what could have happened. Also this was not one High School Building. It’s a large campus.

I agree that if people were allowed to carry guns this would have turned out better but why in order to promote the 2nd amendment do you have to rail against cops many who would agree with you on the gun issue?

I would think most of these rampages would never happen altogether if those slowly working themselves up into an orgy of carnage knew that, say, one out of ten people had means to defend themselves and do the would-be rampager in.

Such folk know that the average citizenry is unarmed, and that it would take several minutes for any response from the authorities, who do nothing but set up perimeters etc etc. It is this artificially forced, unarmed interzones where they know they can do as they please to satiate whatever demons are plaguing them. If they knew that as soon as they began their doings they’d receive one between the eyes, they’d think long and hard about it.

The answer seems so simple, allow concealed weapons. Then the odds even up fairly quickly.

1. The ugly consequences of officially gainsaying the natural right of any presumptively law abiding citizen of 1 of the states, in this case over whelmingly Virginian, to have himself the means to project effective force defencively.

2. Despite anarcho-libertarian wishfulness the inevitability of severe social pathologies on the part of a minimum proportion of plainly unassimilable resident or long term visiting non-western aliens in a nigh open immigration regime. Scoffers, skeptics & deniers see VDare.com.

3. The very real possibility, considered by myself yesterday before I had a chance to see what may have been cited on Rense.com of Theodore Lang, Alex Jones et alii, yesterday’s mass killing was a secret federal black operation over seen by the intelligence community to further new world order aims. Of course the police imposed what they are pleased to call standard procedure because the vast majority of them has no idea what a tool of the new world order it is & the rest knows on what side its bread is buttered–& may even include some characters resolved to help themselves to divers perquisites of being tasked with enforcing the enserfment of all us bothersome ordinary people.

We all should know by now the Anglo-American elites’ main excuse for plotting tyranny is the odious climate of discourse created since the early new deal by us re-actionists who have rashly accused Anglo-American elites of plotting tyranny; keep firm hold of your guns!

(1) I doubt 30 people would have been killed if there had even been one other armed student in the building,

(2) In situations like this, people need to understand that they need to fight back, not cower while hoping not to be shot.

Inevitably pro-control folk are going to have a field day over this. But since an awful lot of Americans prefer to have firearms, after the initial heat dies down, will there in fact be a bigger backlash of folks who’ll say that ‘do-gooders are trying to disarm the honest people’? Is there enough gun-prefering folk to amend the Constitution’s 2nd Amendment to make it clearer to allow the average person to buy, store, use firearms rather than the ambiguous ‘a well-regulated militia’?

Students are not allowed to have guns on the campus.< This story reads more like a pro-gun prohibition advocacy ad than a news story about today's tragedy.

Here is a timeline & map of campus.