<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain&#8217;s copyright laws, based on a 300-year-old statute, desperately need reshaping for the digital age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.mises.org/5841/britains-copyright-laws-based-on-a-300-year-old-statute-desperately-need-reshaping-for-the-digital-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.mises.org/5841/britains-copyright-laws-based-on-a-300-year-old-statute-desperately-need-reshaping-for-the-digital-age/</link>
	<description>Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artisan</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/5841/britains-copyright-laws-based-on-a-300-year-old-statute-desperately-need-reshaping-for-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-106122</link>
		<dc:creator>Artisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 02:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/005841.asp#comment-106122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David C disciple made it to the second post! What a surprise!

...So what&#039;s new, then ?

Wikipedia about paranoid statements such as &quot;decriminalize ipod users&quot;:

&quot;Copyrights are generally enforced by the holder in a &lt;b&gt; civil law court &lt;/b&gt;, but there are also criminal infringement statutes. Criminal sanctions are generally aimed at serious counterfeiting or file sharing activity&quot;



This is also interesting:

&quot;In the United States the AHRA (Audio Home Recording Act Codified in Section 10, 1992) prohibits action against consumers making noncommercial recordings of music, in return for royalties on both media and devices plus mandatory copy-control mechanisms on recorders.

    Section 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions

    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David C disciple made it to the second post! What a surprise!</p>
<p>&#8230;So what&#8217;s new, then ?</p>
<p>Wikipedia about paranoid statements such as &#8220;decriminalize ipod users&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Copyrights are generally enforced by the holder in a <b> civil law court </b>, but there are also criminal infringement statutes. Criminal sanctions are generally aimed at serious counterfeiting or file sharing activity&#8221;</p>
<p>This is also interesting:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the United States the AHRA (Audio Home Recording Act Codified in Section 10, 1992) prohibits action against consumers making noncommercial recordings of music, in return for royalties on both media and devices plus mandatory copy-control mechanisms on recorders.</p>
<p>    Section 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions</p>
<p>    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/5841/britains-copyright-laws-based-on-a-300-year-old-statute-desperately-need-reshaping-for-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-106004</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/005841.asp#comment-106004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyrights and the freedoms they steal are one of the defining issues of the information age.  Considering all the ignorance out there about them, I think it&#039;s a very appropiate to keep this issue on the front burner.  

One more thing.  The only appropiate way to reform copyright is to set the length of the copyright term to zero.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyrights and the freedoms they steal are one of the defining issues of the information age.  Considering all the ignorance out there about them, I think it&#8217;s a very appropiate to keep this issue on the front burner.  </p>
<p>One more thing.  The only appropiate way to reform copyright is to set the length of the copyright term to zero.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boerd</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/5841/britains-copyright-laws-based-on-a-300-year-old-statute-desperately-need-reshaping-for-the-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-105990</link>
		<dc:creator>Boerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/005841.asp#comment-105990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kinsella posts about intellecual property right? 
WHAT A SUPRISE!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinsella posts about intellecual property right?<br />
WHAT A SUPRISE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/328 objects using apc

 Served from: archive.mises.org @ 2013-05-22 10:01:07 by W3 Total Cache -->