1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar
Source link: http://archive.mises.org/4740/obesity-vs-the-fourth-amendment/

Obesity vs. The Fourth Amendment

February 27, 2006 by

Last week, the Federal Trade Commission published a Federal Register notice seeking public comments on “marketing activities and expenditures of the food industry targeted toward children and adolescents.” Last November, Congress ordered the FTC to prepare a report on this subject by July 1 of this year. The FTC is now seeking “empirical data” and other relevant information for use in the report.A public comment request is unremarkable and generally unobjectionable. But the FTC’s notice also states that

[t]he FTC is interested in receiving publicly available information that can be used to prepare the report. However, because it is unlikely that information sufficient to prepare the report is publicly available, the Commission likely will later issue orders under Section 6(b) of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. § 46(b)) to obtain needed information from food industry members.

In other words, the FTC will force companies to turn over private information without a subpoena. The statute cited by the FTC purportedly authorizes the agency

To require, by general or special orders, persons, partnerships, and corporations, engaged in or whose business affects commerce . . . to file with the Commission in such form as the Commission may prescribe annual or special, or both annual and special, reports or answers in writing to specific questions, furnishing to the Commission such information as it may require as to the organization, business, conduct, practices, management, and relation to other corporations, partnerships, and individuals of the respective persons, partnerships, and corporations filing such reports or answers in writing. Such reports and answers shall be made under oath, or otherwise, as the Commission may prescribe, and shall be filed with the Commission within such reasonable period as the Commission may prescribe, unless additional time be granted in any case by the Commission. (Emphasis added.)

Calling a subpoena a “general or special order” is a sleight-of-hand designed to confuse an unambiguous constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment states:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Emphasis added.)

There is no “probable cause” for the FTC to forcibly search any company under the pretext of preparing a report for Congress. Indeed, the legislative language authorizing the report only maintains that Congress “is concerned about the growing rate of childhood and adolescent obesity and the food industry’s marketing practices for these populations.” Congressional “concern” about a subject beyond the federal government’s enumerated powers—the framers gave Congress the power to fix the “standard of weights and measures,” not the weights of children—is not probable cause.

[Previously posted on the Voluntary Trade Council Weblog.]

{ 3 comments }

Brad Dexter February 28, 2006 at 2:40 pm

I can only assume this is only the first shot over the bow viz food.

A few years back, after the cigarette settlement, there were many of us who said it was only a matter of time before food was attacked in a similar manner, only to be scoffed at (just as people chuckled decades ago when smoking was attacked). But the main argument wasn’t, per se, that smoking was bad for you, are that it is addictive, but that the companies “spiked” the product to make it more attractive and MORE addictive. That after years of socialistic softening of attitudes and a packing together of Attornies General with gubernatorial aspirations.

And now food. And of course the excuse that “we’re paying for the health consequences” will be tossed out, and “it’s for the children” will be used, and the incarnate evil of business will be dusted off, and eager Statists yearning for higher offices (and Power) will be there to push the suits.

And yet people STILL believe that they don’t live in a socialist State.

Mathieu Bedard March 2, 2006 at 5:16 am

What struck me in the documentary/movie “Supersize Me” is that all the schools serving healthy food are private schools, the worse students are all public schools. Health needs more market and less state, not the opposite..

Dewaine March 2, 2006 at 6:55 pm

A predictable solution:

Everyone has to weigh-in with the IRS on Dec. 31 each year, and pay additional tax on each pound over the weight guidelines.

That ought to help shape up this fat country!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: