<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wieser and Smart: Austrian Classics Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.mises.org/4735/wieser-and-smart-austrian-classics-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.mises.org/4735/wieser-and-smart-austrian-classics-online/</link>
	<description>Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick T. Long</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/4735/wieser-and-smart-austrian-classics-online/comment-page-1/#comment-46354</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick T. Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/004735.asp#comment-46354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the link to that Bostaph article:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae6_2_1.pdf&quot;&gt;http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae6_2_1.pdf&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the link to that Bostaph article:</p>
<p><a href="http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae6_2_1.pdf">http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae6_2_1.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Sperduto</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/4735/wieser-and-smart-austrian-classics-online/comment-page-1/#comment-46350</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Sperduto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/004735.asp#comment-46350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the Friedrich von Wieser issue discussed above by Professor Long, in addition to the noted article by Professor Joseph Salerno, Professor Samuel Bostaph has written an outstanding article entitled &quot;Wieser on Economic Calculation under Socialism&quot; that appeared in the QJAE, Summer 2003 (Volume 6, Number 2).  
 
Also, I believe it would be helpful to quote Mises from his &quot;Notes and Recollections&quot; (pages 35-36) regarding his evaluation of Wieser&#039;s contributions to the Austrian School:

&quot;[Wieser] was a highly cultured gentleman, had a fine intellect, and was an honest scholar.  Before many others, he was fortunate to become acquainted with the work of Menger, the significance of which he recognized immediately.  He enriched the thought in some respects, although he was no creative thinker and in general was more harmful than useful.  He never really understood the gist of the idea of Subjectivism in the Austrian School of thought, which limitation caused him to make many unfortunate mistakes.  His imputation theory is untenable.  His ideas on value calculation justify the conclusion that he could not be called a member of the Austrian School, but rather was a member of the Lausanne School, which in Austria was represented brilliantly by Rudolf Auspitz and Richard Lieben.&quot;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Friedrich von Wieser issue discussed above by Professor Long, in addition to the noted article by Professor Joseph Salerno, Professor Samuel Bostaph has written an outstanding article entitled &#8220;Wieser on Economic Calculation under Socialism&#8221; that appeared in the QJAE, Summer 2003 (Volume 6, Number 2).  </p>
<p>Also, I believe it would be helpful to quote Mises from his &#8220;Notes and Recollections&#8221; (pages 35-36) regarding his evaluation of Wieser&#8217;s contributions to the Austrian School:</p>
<p>&#8220;[Wieser] was a highly cultured gentleman, had a fine intellect, and was an honest scholar.  Before many others, he was fortunate to become acquainted with the work of Menger, the significance of which he recognized immediately.  He enriched the thought in some respects, although he was no creative thinker and in general was more harmful than useful.  He never really understood the gist of the idea of Subjectivism in the Austrian School of thought, which limitation caused him to make many unfortunate mistakes.  His imputation theory is untenable.  His ideas on value calculation justify the conclusion that he could not be called a member of the Austrian School, but rather was a member of the Lausanne School, which in Austria was represented brilliantly by Rudolf Auspitz and Richard Lieben.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 295/300 objects using apc

 Served from: archive.mises.org @ 2013-06-19 06:06:48 by W3 Total Cache -->