Tyler Cowen wonders whether we are in a housing bubble.
- Housing can be lived in, most buyers have only one home, transaction costs are relatively high, and rarely are homes sold and resold in a matter of days. All those features militate against a housing bubble.
- [in] California, where home prices climbed 20% over the past year. That means that this year, mortgage credit there has an inflationary bias: More credit will be created simply because of the prices of the homes have gone up. Even if the number of transactions is flat this year with last, 15%-20% more credit will be created. And home prices have risen across the whole nation, which will feed more speculative excess, more transactions and more credit creation. Even Freddie Mac, which has been moaning about falling originations and fewer refinancings, estimates total mortgage credit growth of 11.9% this year (vs. a record $1.19 trillion, or 12.8% increase, in 2004). That is the dynamic that I’m not sure the Fed fully appreciates. Yet it is a key dynamic because all of this new mortgage credit is creating distorted spending patterns, and, especially, over-consumption. Yet the Fed doesn’t seem to have a problem with it. From what I’m reading, they seem to be expecting a natural slowdown in the growth of mortgage credit this year. But that’s just not the way that bubbles work. It won’t gently slow just because rates have risen a little bit. Inching rates up in baby steps isn’t going to curb mortgage borrowing, no way. Speculative psychology is so strong in housing, they’re really going to have to ratchet rates up.
Another of the more perceptive critics of Greenspan and his bubbles, William Fleckenstein, describes how the recently released Fed minutes reveal that they knew that there was a stock market bubble in 1999. One wonders, will the 2004-2005 minutes, to be released in 2009 and later, reveal a similar consciousness of the current housing mania? See Fed Sees Bubbles, by William Fleckenstein.
Economist Paul Kasriel, an Austrian in the private sector analyzes how Growth in Household Debt Is Concentrated in Mortgage Debt (see also: Kasriel, Households – Still Running on Empty!). According to Kasriel, mortgage debt is the funding of consumption through credit creation, which necessarily removes funds that would otherwise be available for productive investment
In The April 11th issue of the Daily Reckoning, Bill Bonner reports (and while you are there, check out the Mogambo’s column half way down while you are on the site)
- Half the new jobs created in California in the last two years are connected to residential real estate. Now, 10% of all private sector jobs in the state are connected to the house price bubble.
For more on the real estate bubble, see:
- In Seattle, people quitting their jobs to day-trade real estate
- In Orange County (CA), popularity of interest-only mortgages surges
- Forget the official offer date — the house may already be sold
- SF Area Homes Up $36,000 in one Month, and, not surprisingly Higher rates dampen home ownership dreams in Bay Area
- Real estate market facing aggravated excess liquidity by James Grant
- In Hottest Markets, Renting is the Real Bargain
- Aptly titled Putting Stock in Property
- Financial Times A New Gold Rush in Property
- Makin Greenspan’s Second Bubble
- Twenty-somethings getting into it: Hey Dude, Where’s My Rent?
- We are shocked, shocked to read that Fannie Mae has been removed from Business Ethics magazine’s list of the top 100 most ethical corporations
- LA Times reports on the spread of interest-only loans They’re In — but Not Home Free
- Housing Mania Will End in Tears
- The Housing Bubble Doesn’t Add Up