“Where society is so organized as to reduce arbitrarily or even suppress the sphere in which freedom is legitimately exercised, the result is that the life of society becomes progressively disorganized and goes into decline.”
So writes John Paul II in Centesimus Annus (1991) on socialism and social democracy. The Pope might have used the phrase of Mises’s: Planned Chaos.
The idea that imposed order leads to disorder, and freedom leads to genuine order, is not new; it is a claim that is at the very heart of the classical liberal tradition. What was new in 1991 was to see this insight recaste and reargued from the point of view of Catholic anthropology. The Pope understood that the totalist claims of socialist states were lies that were impoverishing people and souls, and he embraced the core institutions of the business economy–rooted in freedom, respectful of rights, directed toward truth–as the only viable and moral replacement.
This was the argument for a free society made in the years following the collapse of central planing in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union and, really, most of the entire world. He pushed the argument further to denounce the social-assistance state of developed ‘capitalist’ economies for wasting resources, multiplying bureaucracies, and depriving society of human energies.
This was a restatement and embrace of liberalism, a recapturing too of the tradition of thought that gave birth to economic science in the first place (a point fully demonstrated in Rothbard’s History of Economics Thought, which is out of print, but also Chafuen’s Faith and Liberty, and this summary piece by Jésus Huerto De Soto).
Many have speculated about the relationship of the personalism of John Paul II (see his overlooked treatise The Acting Person, written during the 2nd Vatican Council) and the Austrian School (Human Action). Centesimus Annus seemed to give every reason to believe there is a basis for that comparison.
I wrote more on this encyclical here. More on the economics of JPII: 1, 2, 3, 4. Also, this piece by Duncan Reekie, on Mises’s and Knight’s view of caritas in relationship to the Christian tradition, is very interesting.
In any case, freedom has a lost a great modern champion with the death of John Paul II. May his legacy continue to inspire people to throw off the chains of tyranny.
{ 59 comments }
← Previous Comments
As you know Mike it is blank verse, not meter.
Having lived in both Nazi occupied Poland and Communist occupied Poland Pope John Paul II knew of what he spoke. Under totalitarian regimes there are lots of rules enforced at the discretion of the local, regional or national despot. Read the Black Book of Communism to fully appreciate the arbitrary and capricious nature of totalitarian rule – it is the rule of the thug.
Jacob
Wrote: It is the rule of the thug
The words Nazi and Communism have through the years lost all semblems of meaning other than they having the meaning of discribing the exact same type of human behavior.
At one point in history they were disciptive words discribing the extremes of the political spectrum from the extreme right to the extreme left. Now the extreme right call themselves “Compassionate Conservatives”.
Rolf: From an economic perspective, the major difference between Nazism and Communism was one of economic organization. In both systems, the government dictatorially controls economic activity, especially what is produced, so there is little difference from a property rights perspective. From this viewpoint, the Right/Left distinction is nonsense. However, under Nazism, the price system for the factors of production, while extremely hampered, is not abolished, as it would be under true Communism. Hence, Fascist economies can still function with some, although admittedly reduced, efficiency, while true communist/socialist economies collapse from their inability to economically calculate and rationally allocate the factors of production.
Dennis Sperduto
Thank you for the economic distinction and clarfication. My primary focus is the human behavioral factor. I do not believe in the idea that “The end justifies the means” when it involves life forms. When I am creating a piece of sculpture then of course “The end justifies the means” as the distruction of one form is necessary for the creation of another. The extermination of millions of people is not justified in the creation of any economic system.
Be it nazi or communism or ruthless capitalism or any other form of fascism.
Informative post, Im now one of your site subscribers
I enjoyed this great article. Surface magic LLC are local specialists in the WNY area. In case you ever require any of our services performed in this area then let us know. As Surface Magic only use the best materials and proper training to perform the job correctly.
Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based upon on the same information you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an email.
Thanks for the interesting information that ipicked up!
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.