Comments on: Spitzer Charges Against Wall Street Were Baseless http://archive.mises.org/3057/spitzer-charges-against-wall-street-were-baseless/ Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil Wed, 22 May 2013 12:12:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: edoardo rozza http://archive.mises.org/3057/spitzer-charges-against-wall-street-were-baseless/comment-page-1/#comment-11258 edoardo rozza Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:46:49 +0000 http://blog.mises.org/archives/003057.asp#comment-11258 Mr. Henderson, I’m talking about take the defense of a very difficult enquiry basically lost, to cover better a poor innocent people persecuted by an implacable judge.It’ clear? For money, of course.

]]> By: JS Henderson http://archive.mises.org/3057/spitzer-charges-against-wall-street-were-baseless/comment-page-1/#comment-11223 JS Henderson Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:19:18 +0000 http://blog.mises.org/archives/003057.asp#comment-11223 Rozza and Nesfield, perhaps you could re-write your posts using proper English grammar. It is difficult to understand elliptical questions and/or run-on, typographical error-riddled sentences.

To Rozza: I don’t understand your point about “I can do it better.” What are you talking about?

]]> By: James Nesfield http://archive.mises.org/3057/spitzer-charges-against-wall-street-were-baseless/comment-page-1/#comment-11208 James Nesfield Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:01:27 +0000 http://blog.mises.org/archives/003057.asp#comment-11208 The misconduct was non-existent is a far reaching statement considering the facts of the case. The fact that a group of judges judged the plaintiffs as somewhat unacceptable given the nature of their work high risk speculators does not remove the misconduct. Merrill is lucky they where non banned from conducting securities business in the State of New York. A good way to look at this is if you where a prostitute and some one killed you does it remove the murder because you are a prostitute? The answer is no and twenty judges could declair you free. The 2nd circuit court should hold their heads low the rule of law has gone the way of the bank balance. Spitzer should relaunch the case with other plaintiffs ones more acceptable to the jurist. The statement that no misconduct happened is short sighted please recall that pension funds and other forms of retirement money where involved. Of course Merrill got off lightly they are still in business orperating with the same lack of ethical restraint they have always had. Henry Blodgett is a whores whore and so are speculators but crimes and the rule of law should not be removed due to the nature of the enviroment it is happens in. Consider this I have never seen a stock bought in my whole life only sold Blodgett sold stock with a huge amounts of lies and his conflict of interest is only replicated in Chinese government offices. Spitzer drew a remedy from Satan himself Merrill Lynch. I think the judges should be scorned because I suspent they where paid off or influenced. I suggest that the need for Blodgetts has seen better days if real time accounting for public companies can be implemented the shareholders like the banks do now will recieve valid financial information without the spin of second hand journalist like Blodgett. It should be noted Blodgett also did investment banking deals with the same companies stocks he covered a void of ethics in courts and the boardrooms is more highlighted by Spitzers honesty.

]]> By: edoardo rozza http://archive.mises.org/3057/spitzer-charges-against-wall-street-were-baseless/comment-page-1/#comment-11204 edoardo rozza Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:14:46 +0000 http://blog.mises.org/archives/003057.asp#comment-11204 Mr.Henderson,what you are selling on this site? The candid brave hearts of this bankgansters? You have my email and I can do it better. Right?

]]>