<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam Smith&#8217;s Marketplace of Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.mises.org/1917/adam-smiths-marketplace-of-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.mises.org/1917/adam-smiths-marketplace-of-life/</link>
	<description>Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen W. Carson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/1917/adam-smiths-marketplace-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen W. Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/archives/001917.asp#comment-1996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...there has been a feeling about that Smith was a first rate economist, but a second rate philosopher.&quot;  As readers of Austrian revisionist work on Smith know, he was a second rate economist. (e.g. See Rothbard&#039;s History of Economic Thought)  Perhaps he was a first rate philosopher (I was much more impressed with Theory of Moral Sentiments, a careful scholarly work, than Wealth of Nations, a sloppy hodgepodge of unoriginal or just wrong economics).  It would be just about right for the popular conception of Smith to be just reverse of the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;there has been a feeling about that Smith was a first rate economist, but a second rate philosopher.&#8221;  As readers of Austrian revisionist work on Smith know, he was a second rate economist. (e.g. See Rothbard&#8217;s History of Economic Thought)  Perhaps he was a first rate philosopher (I was much more impressed with Theory of Moral Sentiments, a careful scholarly work, than Wealth of Nations, a sloppy hodgepodge of unoriginal or just wrong economics).  It would be just about right for the popular conception of Smith to be just reverse of the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 281/286 objects using apc

 Served from: archive.mises.org @ 2013-05-21 07:19:36 by W3 Total Cache -->