1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar
Source link: http://archive.mises.org/18598/the-nations-most-profitable-bank/

The Nation’s Most Profitable Bank

October 3, 2011 by

All is not well in bankland, despite the industry earning $28.8 billion in the second quarter, nearly $8 billion more than a year ago. Earnings have improved for eight quarters in a row. Not so coincidentally, loan-loss provisions fell by $21.4 billion from the second quarter of last year. So any grow in earnings is from setting aside less money for bad loans. Banks figure the worst is over.

Revenues for the nation’s banks were lower for the second consecutive quarter and Bank of America and others are trading at a fraction of book value, which means the market believes there are more write downs and losses to come.

But those numbers don’t include the nation’s central bank–the Fed. The Fed is making money like..well..it was printing the stuff.

In his “Contrary Indicator” column, Daniel Gross writes half the story,

The Fed doesn’t make money the way regular banks do — by charging ATM fees and making mortgage and credit card loans. Rather, it collects interest on the securities it acquires, by lending money to banks, and by charging fees for certain services.

What he doesn’t tell you is that the Fed’s cost basis in these securities and loans is zero. Bernanke and company have a bottomless checkbook. Money for nothing.

So as long as the entities that borrow from the Fed pay their interest, “this is a business so easy even bankers could make a profit doing it.”

And the central bankers at the Fed do just that. It used to be the Fed made a steady $20-$30 billion year in and year out. Then came the meltdown, and the Fed’s balance sheet melted up.

The central bank’s earnings rose to $53.4 billion in 2009 and jumped again to just short of $82 billion in 2010.

Gross figures the Fed to make even more this year. Bernanke’s balance sheet foots to $2.83 trillion, with $2.6 trillion of that in securities. “And through September 29, the next-to-last day of Fiscal 2011, Fed earnings had contributed $82.5 billion in revenues to the government for the fiscal year, according to the Daily Treasury Statement,” writes Gross.

The central bank has a long way to go to cover the federal government’s $1.3 trillion deficit. But Bernanke has plenty more bailing out to do, which will mean a bigger balance sheet and more earnings.

A bigger Fed plus more TARP (which was reportedly profitable) means the deficit problem can be licked in no time.

{ 5 comments }

Cory Brickner October 3, 2011 at 3:20 pm

Since when is a 52.2% loss of capital a profit?

http://projects.propublica.org/bailout/list
Recipients:
926

Total Committed:
$634,125,802,738

Total Disbursed:
$579,952,314,483

Total Returned:
$277,499,218,263

Walt D. October 3, 2011 at 4:43 pm

“Since when is a 52.2% loss of capital a profit?”
When you are in the Congressional Budget Office. GAAP rules do not apply.

J. Murray October 3, 2011 at 4:52 pm

Being someone in the accounting profession, I can twist any number to make it look however you want. You want a profit for the shareholders? No problem. Want to show a loss to the IRS? I got you covered. Want the real numbers that matter? That’s my specialty.

PrintButtonMoney October 3, 2011 at 8:14 pm

Obviously the fed knows best…. God forbid they aknowledge actual market conditions in any arena, let alone earnings and forecasts. Heck, it’s probably the weather’s fault anyway.
ZeroHedge just posted an interesting article about the confidence in gold vs. other currencies in the market, which you can find a link to at my blog.
Government by the Banksters for the Banksters.

Michael A. Clem October 5, 2011 at 4:33 pm

Gee, it’s no wonder they won’t let just anyone have a printing press–it’s just plain stealing!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: