The Obama administration has implemented cap and trade through the EPA after it had been rejected by the Congress, and ruled out by the courts. The Obama administration’s EPA decreed through administration law that cap and trade is now the law of the land, a direct rebuke of Congress and the courts, and so it stands right now as law of the land.

Our interior department has all but banned expanding energy resources. They issue permits of exploration and not for extraction. Only 1 permit has been issued since the BP spill. Bill Clinton himself called this “crazy.”

It used to be that Congress would appropriate funds in order to implement law. Obamcare subverted this process by securing funding for a decade at a time, making it all but impossible to stop its implementation while there is a Democratic president. $120 billion has been allotted to the bureaucracy (the Executive), out or reach of the legislature (that is, the law making body of government that the people can affect through elections).

General Electric is all but a wing of the Democrat party at the moment. It funds MSNBC, a Democrat propaganda machine. It has a vested interest in Health IT services, and therefore interested in seeing Obamacare implemented.

The National Education Association has been washing money through its union and funneling it into the Democrat party, which perpetuates a symbiotic relationship between the government and the union representing virtually all teachers nationwide. It has been this way for decades, yet, and it explains why there is never true education reform. The union extracts money from the tax base, and so the citizen is involuntarily giving to the Democrat party and electing those whose interests directly oppose their own.

We couldn’t have been happier to run Mubarak out of town, but the terrorist Gaddafi, friend of Rev. Wright, Farrakan, etc. we barely notice. France and the U.K. take the lead. Odd, isn’t it?

Democracy ain’t perfect, I know. I’ve read Menckenn and Nock and Rothbard etc. But until human nature changes, the most progressive (in the true sense of the word) form of government is Constitutionally-limited democracy: Constitutionally-limited because any good government must have strictures to keep it confined to essential tasks, and democracy because it provides for non-violent transition of leaders.

The Republican leadership has been atrocious in their dealing with Obama in 2011. I realize this. If they do not get their act together they’re going to split the party. But we’re the ones who suffer from their incompetence, and thus it behooves us to speak up, educate, organize, and elect more legislators who are guided by our Constitution, and not their own vision of an ideal society.

http://blogs.forbes.com/michaelpollaro/2011/03/17/america-poised-for-a-hyperinflationary-event-the-roadmap/

It helps that one of the great inflationists of all time, a person who seems to have learned all the wrong lessons from the Great Depression, happens to chair the Fed.

On the contrary, the effects are very predictable. World wide poverty and inflation, trade wars and later on real wars.

Is this parody?

Name one substantive policy that has changed since the inauguration of Obama.

Politicians and Wall Street are addicted to the Fed feeding their habit. If they stop it will be nasty in the short-term, but we’ll all be much better off in the long run. The problem is that with elections every other year there really isn’t a politically good time to detox, so the Fed will keep right on feeding the habit because they don’t know what else to do.

and here,
http://www.wolf1168.us/misc/Articles%20of%20Interest/When%20Money%20Dies.pdf

and here,
http://www.cato.org/zimbabwe

and here,
http://mises.org/books/bubbles.pdf

I would like an article that explores this claim in detail and provides examples and analysis. Thank you.

It’s “so” because they have different approaches to everything, from spending, to entitlements, to foreign policy, to dealing with allies/enemies, to Israel, to how they answer questions, to their legislative tactics, to the judges they appoint, etc. etc. etc.

I will then ask you how is the Ptolemaic system working out for you

We do have to address unemployment, and as an employer, the problem is unemployment insurance. All our laid off workers are collecting unemployment and if I hire them back, I have to pay a higher unemployment tax based on their pay. This tax will be held for 3 years, so it is my best interest do work with the people at hand and hold off hiring until the 3 years are up.

So if the government really wanted to jump start hiring, limit the unemployment tax increases!