<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the Lockout, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/</link>
	<description>Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Mynack</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-753815</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Mynack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-753815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is a ridiculous comparison, given the injury level of both sports, and the level of physical exertion inherent in both sports. Given that the majority of the time, baseball players are just standing around, or sitting and watching in a dugout,  while football players are running and getting hit, knocked to the ground, etc. A more accurate comparison would also take time into account, rather than actual games played, since the injury rate is so much higher in the NFL. Can you imagine NFL players trying to play 6-7 games a week?  It&#039;s ludicrous.However, if baseball went to a 16 game season, I might actually watch it, since it wouldn&#039;t be so damned boring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a ridiculous comparison, given the injury level of both sports, and the level of physical exertion inherent in both sports. Given that the majority of the time, baseball players are just standing around, or sitting and watching in a dugout,  while football players are running and getting hit, knocked to the ground, etc. A more accurate comparison would also take time into account, rather than actual games played, since the injury rate is so much higher in the NFL. Can you imagine NFL players trying to play 6-7 games a week?  It&#8217;s ludicrous.However, if baseball went to a 16 game season, I might actually watch it, since it wouldn&#8217;t be so damned boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Brancato</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-753241</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Brancato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-753241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cultural attitudes - and changes in those attitudes over time - figure greatly in all of this.

Half a century or more ago in baseball, for instance, it was considered important for a team to finish in &quot;the first division&quot; - this meant fourth place or higher in the either of the eight-team leagues that existed prior to 1961, when the American League expanded to 10 teams, the National League following suit a year later, causing &quot;first division&quot; to be redefined as a fifth-place finish or better.  And finishing in &quot;the cellar&quot; - last place in either league - was an ignominy to be evaded at all costs.  The fan base heartily embraced both these concepts, and similar ones in the other major sports generally.

But in recent decades, an all-or-nothing mentality has replaced this - epitomized perhaps most eloquently by the &quot;You Don&#039;t Win Silver - You Lose Gold&quot; ads Nike plastered all over Atlanta during the 1996 Summer Olympics.  Indeed, today if a team repeatedly comes close to winning the championship without actually doing so, that team is reviled as &quot;chokers,&quot; and even greater opprobium is rained down upon them than if they were finishing in last place year after year - although a team in the latter situation will now be completely ignored, its games unattended and unwatched, prompting the current obsession of league bureaucracies with &quot;competitive balance.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cultural attitudes &#8211; and changes in those attitudes over time &#8211; figure greatly in all of this.</p>
<p>Half a century or more ago in baseball, for instance, it was considered important for a team to finish in &#8220;the first division&#8221; &#8211; this meant fourth place or higher in the either of the eight-team leagues that existed prior to 1961, when the American League expanded to 10 teams, the National League following suit a year later, causing &#8220;first division&#8221; to be redefined as a fifth-place finish or better.  And finishing in &#8220;the cellar&#8221; &#8211; last place in either league &#8211; was an ignominy to be evaded at all costs.  The fan base heartily embraced both these concepts, and similar ones in the other major sports generally.</p>
<p>But in recent decades, an all-or-nothing mentality has replaced this &#8211; epitomized perhaps most eloquently by the &#8220;You Don&#8217;t Win Silver &#8211; You Lose Gold&#8221; ads Nike plastered all over Atlanta during the 1996 Summer Olympics.  Indeed, today if a team repeatedly comes close to winning the championship without actually doing so, that team is reviled as &#8220;chokers,&#8221; and even greater opprobium is rained down upon them than if they were finishing in last place year after year &#8211; although a team in the latter situation will now be completely ignored, its games unattended and unwatched, prompting the current obsession of league bureaucracies with &#8220;competitive balance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Murray</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-753095</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-753095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick and dirty analysis I did for support. I used ESPN&#039;s history of the MLB and took a snapshot of each division when the teams played just 16 games and then again at the end of the season. I used the 2002 through 2010 seasons for this analysis.

In a 16 game season, 24 of the 30 teams would have made it to the playoffs at least once, or 80% of the league, during this 9 year stretch. In the complete season, 19 teams, or 63%, made it to the playoffs once during this stretch.

Only 1/3 of the teams leading at the 16 game mark make it to the playoffs in any given season.

If the season ended at 16 games, the Yankees would have only won a division once in the past 9 seasons. They won it six times at the end of the season during the same stretch.

Teams that made the playoffs once in the fictional 16 game season went to the playoffs an average of 2.25 times during the 9 seasons under the fictional 16 game season. Teams that made the playoffs in the normal season repeated 3.13 times on average.

The Twins, Yankees, Cardinals, and Angels won their division in 5 or more of the past 9 seasons. No team in the fictional 16 game season won the division 5 times or more.

It&#039;s only 9 data samples, but it&#039;s already demonstrating that a short season generates a more &quot;competitive&quot; result when compared to a long season. I&#039;d like to do a more comprehensive comparison, but it would be incredibly difficult given the nature of expansion teams and city changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick and dirty analysis I did for support. I used ESPN&#8217;s history of the MLB and took a snapshot of each division when the teams played just 16 games and then again at the end of the season. I used the 2002 through 2010 seasons for this analysis.</p>
<p>In a 16 game season, 24 of the 30 teams would have made it to the playoffs at least once, or 80% of the league, during this 9 year stretch. In the complete season, 19 teams, or 63%, made it to the playoffs once during this stretch.</p>
<p>Only 1/3 of the teams leading at the 16 game mark make it to the playoffs in any given season.</p>
<p>If the season ended at 16 games, the Yankees would have only won a division once in the past 9 seasons. They won it six times at the end of the season during the same stretch.</p>
<p>Teams that made the playoffs once in the fictional 16 game season went to the playoffs an average of 2.25 times during the 9 seasons under the fictional 16 game season. Teams that made the playoffs in the normal season repeated 3.13 times on average.</p>
<p>The Twins, Yankees, Cardinals, and Angels won their division in 5 or more of the past 9 seasons. No team in the fictional 16 game season won the division 5 times or more.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only 9 data samples, but it&#8217;s already demonstrating that a short season generates a more &#8220;competitive&#8221; result when compared to a long season. I&#8217;d like to do a more comprehensive comparison, but it would be incredibly difficult given the nature of expansion teams and city changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick E</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-753090</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-753090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great piece. I personally have no problem with NFL players like Stafford signing these mammoth contracts, or even with players who hold out for contract extensions. The simple fact is that playing football at the highest levels for several years is hazardous to your health, and the chances are high that injuries will limit you to a few years&#039; career in the NFL. Given that, I have no objection to a player taking every cent the market is willing to pay, and/or withholding their services if they believe their interests are best served by a trade to another team. If I were a pro football player, I would do the same thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece. I personally have no problem with NFL players like Stafford signing these mammoth contracts, or even with players who hold out for contract extensions. The simple fact is that playing football at the highest levels for several years is hazardous to your health, and the chances are high that injuries will limit you to a few years&#8217; career in the NFL. Given that, I have no objection to a player taking every cent the market is willing to pay, and/or withholding their services if they believe their interests are best served by a trade to another team. If I were a pro football player, I would do the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick E</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-753088</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-753088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Pittsburgh is really pinching pennies on the contracts for Crosby, Malkin, Staal, Fleury, Kunitz, Letang, Martin, and Michalek. And the resources of some teams are clearly putting others at a disadvantage: that&#039;s why the Leafs and Rangers keep winning Cups year after year and teams like Pittsburgh, Anaheim, Carolina, and Tampa have seen so little recent success. I thought you Canadians had a better grasp of the facts than that.

The NHL&#039;s problems are due mostly to (a) foolish overexpansion; (b) abysmal marketing of the sport to US-based audiences, particularly following the 2005 lockout; and (c) no apparent clue as to how to address (a) or (b).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Pittsburgh is really pinching pennies on the contracts for Crosby, Malkin, Staal, Fleury, Kunitz, Letang, Martin, and Michalek. And the resources of some teams are clearly putting others at a disadvantage: that&#8217;s why the Leafs and Rangers keep winning Cups year after year and teams like Pittsburgh, Anaheim, Carolina, and Tampa have seen so little recent success. I thought you Canadians had a better grasp of the facts than that.</p>
<p>The NHL&#8217;s problems are due mostly to (a) foolish overexpansion; (b) abysmal marketing of the sport to US-based audiences, particularly following the 2005 lockout; and (c) no apparent clue as to how to address (a) or (b).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim P.</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-753032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-753032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know very little of the ins-and-outs of NFL (and most other sports), but I do sometimes enjoy the weirdness of internal politics and little theoretical bureaucracies. It&#039;s like Alice in Wonderland to me. Sports politics seems sort of a skewed reality where utter nonsense is of the highest possible importance, and the great matters of the real world are largely irrelevant. It&#039;s as if all the real entertainment is behind the scenes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know very little of the ins-and-outs of NFL (and most other sports), but I do sometimes enjoy the weirdness of internal politics and little theoretical bureaucracies. It&#8217;s like Alice in Wonderland to me. Sports politics seems sort of a skewed reality where utter nonsense is of the highest possible importance, and the great matters of the real world are largely irrelevant. It&#8217;s as if all the real entertainment is behind the scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matskralc</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752969</link>
		<dc:creator>matskralc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep. Variance is the friend of the underdog, and the smaller your dataset, the more variance you will tend to have. It&#039;sthe same reason, weaker teams try to limit possessions during individual games. Underdogs work the shot clock down in basketball or run the ball in football in order to kill time and limit possessions. I&#039;d say about 95% of so-called &quot;parity&quot; in the NFL is due to nothing more than the limited number of games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Variance is the friend of the underdog, and the smaller your dataset, the more variance you will tend to have. It&#8217;sthe same reason, weaker teams try to limit possessions during individual games. Underdogs work the shot clock down in basketball or run the ball in football in order to kill time and limit possessions. I&#8217;d say about 95% of so-called &#8220;parity&#8221; in the NFL is due to nothing more than the limited number of games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Murray</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752942</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would venture to say it&#039;s because of the relatively short season for a professional league. 16 games isn&#039;t enough to properly gaugue who is the best and who isn&#039;t. Rarely in baseball or basketball, where the teams are mostly a lock from day 1, do teams ever go 16-0. Many of them start slow and even go 8-8 before getting 100 win seasons. Because of the short season, the statistical variations have a stronger impact on the final record than in a 161 game season. If the NFL season started on the first Sunday in June and ended the last Sunday in December, we&#039;d likely start to see a more consistent post-season lineup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would venture to say it&#8217;s because of the relatively short season for a professional league. 16 games isn&#8217;t enough to properly gaugue who is the best and who isn&#8217;t. Rarely in baseball or basketball, where the teams are mostly a lock from day 1, do teams ever go 16-0. Many of them start slow and even go 8-8 before getting 100 win seasons. Because of the short season, the statistical variations have a stronger impact on the final record than in a 161 game season. If the NFL season started on the first Sunday in June and ended the last Sunday in December, we&#8217;d likely start to see a more consistent post-season lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matskralc</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752867</link>
		<dc:creator>matskralc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might want to do some research (click my name for a link). The lowest payroll in the NHL is the New York Islanders and they are spending at about 70% of the cap. The average team spends at about 90% of the cap, and the median team at about 94%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to do some research (click my name for a link). The lowest payroll in the NHL is the New York Islanders and they are spending at about 70% of the cap. The average team spends at about 90% of the cap, and the median team at about 94%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.M. Oliva</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752858</link>
		<dc:creator>S.M. Oliva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I respectfully suggest you&#039;re confusing correlation with causation. I maintain the NFL&#039;s success is largely unrelated to &quot;parity&quot; and is better explained by other factors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully suggest you&#8217;re confusing correlation with causation. I maintain the NFL&#8217;s success is largely unrelated to &#8220;parity&#8221; and is better explained by other factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.E.C.</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752855</link>
		<dc:creator>J.E.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well to understand the NFL&#039;s quest for parity you have to understand what is being sold. The league as a whole is selling competitive football; individual teams aren&#039;t selling their individual success. Considering that the NFL is much more popular than baseball, I would have to say their plan appears to be working. Generally in baseball we know who is going to be in the running every year. The NFL had 50% turnover in its playoff teams this year and many years has higher turnover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to understand the NFL&#8217;s quest for parity you have to understand what is being sold. The league as a whole is selling competitive football; individual teams aren&#8217;t selling their individual success. Considering that the NFL is much more popular than baseball, I would have to say their plan appears to be working. Generally in baseball we know who is going to be in the running every year. The NFL had 50% turnover in its playoff teams this year and many years has higher turnover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.E.C.</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752854</link>
		<dc:creator>J.E.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I wholeheartedly agree that the government subsidies for professional sports are ridiculous, I think you misunderstand the origin of unions. The first unions were for skilled tradesmen,who pooled their market power in order to command higher rates for their work. In a way, the NFLPA is much closer to the original trade unions than the AFL-CIO is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I wholeheartedly agree that the government subsidies for professional sports are ridiculous, I think you misunderstand the origin of unions. The first unions were for skilled tradesmen,who pooled their market power in order to command higher rates for their work. In a way, the NFLPA is much closer to the original trade unions than the AFL-CIO is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seattle</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752840</link>
		<dc:creator>Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is the most insightful article on the madness of the NFL I&#039;ve ever read! Every sports fan confused by what&#039;s going on should read this. And I say this as someone whose never actually watched a single game! Fantastic work as always, good sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the most insightful article on the madness of the NFL I&#8217;ve ever read! Every sports fan confused by what&#8217;s going on should read this. And I say this as someone whose never actually watched a single game! Fantastic work as always, good sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Albin</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752833</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Albin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NHL seemed to be a special level of insanity a few years ago, with all of the malinvestment through rapid expansion.  Maybe NASCAR, too?  These were popular regional sports that may have grown beyond their venues - smacks of some sort of malinvestment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NHL seemed to be a special level of insanity a few years ago, with all of the malinvestment through rapid expansion.  Maybe NASCAR, too?  These were popular regional sports that may have grown beyond their venues &#8211; smacks of some sort of malinvestment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Murray</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752823</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, so basically that fact only makes my confusion over a union even more well founded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so basically that fact only makes my confusion over a union even more well founded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.M. Oliva</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752822</link>
		<dc:creator>S.M. Oliva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NHL&#039;s problems are almost entirely the result of over-expansion in the 1990s. The league used franchises as a means of &quot;printing money&quot; via expansion fees. It&#039;s the Weimar Republic of sports.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NHL&#8217;s problems are almost entirely the result of over-expansion in the 1990s. The league used franchises as a means of &#8220;printing money&#8221; via expansion fees. It&#8217;s the Weimar Republic of sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.M. Oliva</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752821</link>
		<dc:creator>S.M. Oliva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points all around, and I&#039;ll address some of them in my next post. Just one factual clarification: The minimum salary you cite is actually for rookies. Like many union-based firms, the NFL minimum salary scale rises according to seniority. So for example, the minimum salary for a player with at least four credited seasons is $630,000 in 2010.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points all around, and I&#8217;ll address some of them in my next post. Just one factual clarification: The minimum salary you cite is actually for rookies. Like many union-based firms, the NFL minimum salary scale rises according to seniority. So for example, the minimum salary for a player with at least four credited seasons is $630,000 in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752816</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[personally  i am not an NFL fan but this applies to the NHL too. i as leaf fan forever (hold your laughter) am tired of seeing teams like the leafs, rangers, red wings, etc. having to subsidize the weaker teams in the league. the NHL has a salary cap that is as useless as anything because teams like pittsburgh and atlanta dont even come close to being able to spend that much. the cap is projected to go up to $60 million this year with most teams being able to spend half that amount. like anything in the real world, teams that make money cannot improve themselves because they cant buy the best talent. everyone may $%^&amp; on the yankees but is it their fault they generate so much revenue? of course, spending the most doesnt guarantee success (see aforementioned maple leafs and yankees) but it helps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally  i am not an NFL fan but this applies to the NHL too. i as leaf fan forever (hold your laughter) am tired of seeing teams like the leafs, rangers, red wings, etc. having to subsidize the weaker teams in the league. the NHL has a salary cap that is as useless as anything because teams like pittsburgh and atlanta dont even come close to being able to spend that much. the cap is projected to go up to $60 million this year with most teams being able to spend half that amount. like anything in the real world, teams that make money cannot improve themselves because they cant buy the best talent. everyone may $%^&amp; on the yankees but is it their fault they generate so much revenue? of course, spending the most doesnt guarantee success (see aforementioned maple leafs and yankees) but it helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Murray</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752811</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The whole setup is ridiculous. A union for employees that have a minimum wage of $325,000 (even if it&#039;s four years, that&#039;s still $845k after taxes or nearly 20 years worth of your typical salary in the real world), owners that constantly complain about lacking the resources for stadiums, demand local taxpayers cover the bill, and pitch a fit about their shrinking margins when people complain when they sell a half a can of Bud Lite for $9 when they can easily afford to float bonds and buy one themselves, constant threats to derail the entire business. The whole thing is bizarre.

Even the overall operation is a confused mess. On one hand, they attempt to behave like a McDonalds and put in place things like salary caps and profit sharing to avoid putting its own franchise units out of business that rely on one another to stay in business (if one team puts the others out of business, there&#039;s no one left to play). On the other hand, when a team is poorly managed, they just throw up their hands and say, &quot;Hey, we can&#039;t control the management, they own it.&quot; McDonalds would just strip the franchise from them in the franchise situation or teams would refuse to be scheduled against them in the private entity situation.

The whole situation is maddening (pardon the pun) when I realize the only reason the NFL still even exists is because of all the healthy tax subsidies being siphoned out of my pockets and your pockets. The Arena Football League is infinitely more interesting than the NFL, yet my local team, the Sharks, are stuck renting out a shoddy arena while the lockout king (there&#039;s another bizarre practice, locking out the more lucrative television broadcasts just because the team failed to sell out the game) Jaguars got full reign of a full-on stadium bought and paid for by Joe Taxpayer.

Bah, I&#039;ll just go back to playing video games. At least that hasn&#039;t been completely overrun by government...yet. Canada and the UK are trying their hardest to subsidize that, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole setup is ridiculous. A union for employees that have a minimum wage of $325,000 (even if it&#8217;s four years, that&#8217;s still $845k after taxes or nearly 20 years worth of your typical salary in the real world), owners that constantly complain about lacking the resources for stadiums, demand local taxpayers cover the bill, and pitch a fit about their shrinking margins when people complain when they sell a half a can of Bud Lite for $9 when they can easily afford to float bonds and buy one themselves, constant threats to derail the entire business. The whole thing is bizarre.</p>
<p>Even the overall operation is a confused mess. On one hand, they attempt to behave like a McDonalds and put in place things like salary caps and profit sharing to avoid putting its own franchise units out of business that rely on one another to stay in business (if one team puts the others out of business, there&#8217;s no one left to play). On the other hand, when a team is poorly managed, they just throw up their hands and say, &#8220;Hey, we can&#8217;t control the management, they own it.&#8221; McDonalds would just strip the franchise from them in the franchise situation or teams would refuse to be scheduled against them in the private entity situation.</p>
<p>The whole situation is maddening (pardon the pun) when I realize the only reason the NFL still even exists is because of all the healthy tax subsidies being siphoned out of my pockets and your pockets. The Arena Football League is infinitely more interesting than the NFL, yet my local team, the Sharks, are stuck renting out a shoddy arena while the lockout king (there&#8217;s another bizarre practice, locking out the more lucrative television broadcasts just because the team failed to sell out the game) Jaguars got full reign of a full-on stadium bought and paid for by Joe Taxpayer.</p>
<p>Bah, I&#8217;ll just go back to playing video games. At least that hasn&#8217;t been completely overrun by government&#8230;yet. Canada and the UK are trying their hardest to subsidize that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/15353/behind-the-lockout-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-752798</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=15353#comment-752798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve often wondered about salaries and talent in the sports industry, it seems like much of it is propped up by copyright cartels and government built infrastructure (stadiums, etc ...) , makes me wonder how much of it is artificial.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered about salaries and talent in the sports industry, it seems like much of it is propped up by copyright cartels and government built infrastructure (stadiums, etc &#8230;) , makes me wonder how much of it is artificial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 18/34 queries in 0.045 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 631/651 objects using apc

 Served from: archive.mises.org @ 2013-05-24 16:59:21 by W3 Total Cache -->