America is basically rational, not basically a race.

Let’s throw out a question. What is more important: preserving private property, or being PC (not being ‘racist’)?

Suppose I demonstrated that ALL nonwhite populations in the US support socialism by large majorities, but that whites opposed socialism by an equally large majority. Would you then agree that the cause of liberty in the US would be furthered if nonwhites could be persuaded to leave the country? Would you agree that liberty would be furthered by keeping additional nonwhites (immigrants) out of the country?

The free market in the US has declined directly in tandem with the increase of the nonwhite population – and, yes, that correlation is also causation. No Democrat president has won a majority of the white vote since 1964 – yet they have won titanic majorities of ALL nonwhite groups (including Jews, Grossman – your people supported the Marxist Muslim by 78% – unconscionable!).

I am really shocked at how leftist-brainwashed you people are. Really. I’ve always had a low opinion of libertarians, but the older generation, like Rand (a thoroughgoing white supremacist), Rothbard and Ron Paul, were not in the least ‘touchy’ about acknowledging racial truths. Read some of Ron Paul’s old Reports if you don’t believe me (I have a bunch in hard copy, and I think I should scan them all and post them publicly, just to make sure there is no weaseling about being a libertarian means one has to be against ‘racism’; the one has nothing to do with the other).

Your basic claim is racism, which I addressed and refuted. You may correlate ideas and race as much as you please but you will never find causality because you evade the method of finding causality, man’s mind.

Then it getting any sort of meaningful response is going to be very unlikely. How many Blacks, Asians or Mexicans have you talked to about ‘liberty’ or your political viewpoints? Probably not many (or any) or you wouldn’t of said anything you said. It’s really very stupid and ignorant statement.

“”Disappointing as the GOP invariably is, the Democrats today are pure evil (even from a libertarian perspective).”"

George Bush was every bit as ‘evil’ as Obama. The Republican and Democrats really are the same political movement nowadays. I really don’t see any discernible difference besides posturing. What one party stands for the other opposes as a rule, but they frequently swap positions.

How do you plan to account for us (I am assuming there are others like me) atheists who do not consider religious texts as a source of wisdom?

As Mises stressed, coincidence is not cause. The Germans who supported attacks on liberty under Hitler were white. So what does that mean? And collectivism, whether economic, ethnic, racial, or whatever, is destructive. Man has free will and no innate ideas. Your appeal to race is evil, a rejection of mind for chemicals. You have reduced yourself to a collection of chemicals. Spiritually, youre not human.

Translation: ‘I want liberty, but only for me and people who think and look like me’.

So let’s be simple. Obama is the single greatest threat to both economic prosperity and the long term survival of liberty in the US perhaps in US history. He is undeniably the furthest socialist/Left President. Who elected him (and no, I did not vote for the nearly as awful McCain; I wrote in Ron Paul)? BO’s electoral margin of victory was provided by post-1965 immigrants and their adult descendants (aka “minorities”). If we had had zero immigration since 1965 McCain would be President – and the Congress would be permanently GOP.

The ONLY racial group in America who even slightly supports liberty is whites. This is a fact (I hope no one here denies it, because then the debate is over, and I will have won). Party ID is a rough proxy for gauging commitment to liberty understood to be rooted in property rights (the Rothbard position). EVERY minority group is heavily Democratic, in ID and actual voting. Disappointing as the GOP invariably is, the Democrats today are pure evil (even from a libertarian perspective). So why do idiot libertarians want to increase Democrat numbers by admitting vast hordes of non-white immigrants??!! What insanity – to put ideology ahead or reality!!!!

Diversity is the health of the State. Idiot libertarians might come to understand this after whites have been transformed into a politically powerless minority, one whose new non-white, non-American masters grant them precious little liberty at all.

REPLY

The fact that ABCT proves such cycles are necessary in a fractional-reserve banking system does not mean we get precise predictions in the manner of mathematics based empiricist economics. There does not exist and cannot exist a formula to give the timing for the business cycle so your failure to predict the “timing” has no bearing on Austrian theory. It’s a pity you have such a confused understanding of the basis of the theory but thankfully there are plenty of good resources here to redress that.

Kind regards

It is absolutely insane to think that the Bank of Japan’s low interest rates could somehow NOT cause malinvestment and retard recovery in the Japanese economy. Now Japanese debt to GDP is approaching 200% thanks to constant government stimulus and bailout. If we do the same, we will incur the same results of slow recovery, structural malinvestment and ever increasing debt.

I’ll assume your moniker is in jest since your thinking does not even remotely approximate Hayek.

These are interesting days. I predict that the whole concept of lending money at interest (usury) will be discredited. It’s too bad that Mises with his brilliant mind apparently did not consider what a fellow Hebrew taught 3000 years ago:

Deuteronomy 23:19-20