Wells’s vacillation between socialism and heroic individualism helps explain his conflicted portrayal of the Invisible Man, indeed the basic incoherence of the Invisible Man as a symbol. FULL ARTICLE by Paul Cantor
Source link: http://archive.mises.org/13928/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand-h-g-wellss-critique-of-capitalism/
The Invisible Man and the Invisible Hand: H.G. Wells’s Critique of Capitalism
Previous post: The Ignorance of the New Yorker
Next post: Trademark and Goats-on-the-Roof Bans



{ 5 comments }
Those who know their limits are healthy.
Those who do not are sick.
The Master accepts this sickness as a limitation
And thus becomes immune.
I am working on an article…………
“Count Dracula is a radical Marxist”.
Without divulging the entire storyline, the count and his followers are a fringe Marxist group who attempt to derail Capitalism by sucking the blood out of its elites. They take too long in the planning stage and the fabrication of the CDS and the CDO by the elites themselves does it for them. The story is a bit anticlimatic.
you’re a sick person…but I like that in a guy
capitalism took a similarly-fashioned revenge on H G Wells with Tom Cruise’s version of War of the Worlds
Excellent scholarship. Sorry to state the obvious, but this article gets a “wow” of the first order.
Outstanding, thought-provoking, fascinating. I’m a great fan of Wells as an author, though his half-baked socialism was something of an irritant, even during my schoolboy reads. Years later, still enjoyable tales.
_First Men in the Moon_ is also worth a look, especially considering the “Selenite’s” ant-like collectivism, more paradoxes of individualism and slavery, and his arresting indictment of war.
And what an ending.
Silly tangent, by the way, but I do have to say the James Whale / Claude Rains _Invisible Man_ still stands as a well-deserved cinema classic.
Excellent! A very interesting article recommend to all!
Comments on this entry are closed.