<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Taboo Against Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/</link>
	<description>Proceeding Ever More Boldly Against Evil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Blue</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-806018</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-806018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael&#039;s response to Michael Hardesty is riddled with errors from start to finish. There was never any Nazi plot to take over the world. The Soviets had lost ten times as much land to the Poles as the Germans at Versailles so they had their own interest in settling scores. It was never a plot with the Germans to divide Poland, both sides distrusted one another.
The Sudenten Germans had lived in those areas hundreds of years before there was a united Germany so your attempted rationale for their expulsion of 15 million and murder of 2-3 million fails.
The bogus plan you listed to divide up the world between the Germans and the Soviets never existed.
You need to read the works that Hardesty recommended starting with A.J.P. Taylor&#039;s The Origins Of The Second World War. The Nazi foreign policy was strictly limited to recovering German populated territories
taken by the vengeful Versailles Treaty, the four foreign policy crises of the Rhineland, Austria, Sudentenland and Poland confirm this.
The Japanese had been trying to surrender for six months prior to the bombing, see the Barnes piece in the May 10, 1958 National Review and the Gar Alperowiz book. Your statement that they had no concept of surrender is racist gibberish. Eisenhower and MacArthur and others said there never would have a US invasion of Japan. They would have been blockaded in the worst case but that was not necessary as they had been trying to surrender long before the militarily unjustified atomic war crimes.
The creamatoriums existed and had nothing to do with any gas chambers, they were necessary because of the huge mortality rate from typhus and other diseases particularly in the last 18 months of the war. Had nothing to do with any mass extermination policy, again check out Debating The Holocaust by Thomas Dalton, Rassinier, Mattogno, Rudolph, Faurisson, Graf, Butz and other revisionists.
Go to the CODOH or IHR or VHO websites to get an alternative view to the standard sources you mindlessly parrot.
Many of us Jews think Thomas was on the money, her real frustration was with AIPAC control of the whole US political structure. If at least many of the Jews did leave the region would be better off. Her censure was the usual mindless Israel First idiots. Even if she over spoke she was right in essentials.
It was only the UK and France who made the unwarranted and untenable pledge to Poland that turned a local conflict into a world war exactly as the Brits did in 1914.
Hitler ONLY attacked the Low Countries to get to France before France attacked the same countries first to get to Germany.
Ergo with Norway, Churchill admitted that the Germans beat them to the punch which is why the Allied claim of aggressive war by  Germany at Nuremberg was total hypocrisy.
Franklin, an attack on a military facility like Pearl Harbor is totally different than obliterating a civilian population at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Not even a close call morally.
The Germans never sent out colonies everywhere, Michael. It was the Brits and the French and the Spanish and the Dutch and the Belgians that conquered most of the world outside Europe. The Germans had one African colony which Hitler was never interested in getting back. Hitler also wrote off the Alsace-Lorraine. Your pipe dream of Germany, Japan and Italy dividing the world is a concocted big lie on a par with Roosevelt&#039;s &#039;secret map&#039; of an alleged Nazi plot to take over Latin America. Utter hogwash ! 
Japan was no more imperialistic in Asia than the West which actually stole most of the territory.
Check out Hardesty&#039;s recommendations on Barnes, Taylor, Beard, Tansill, Chamberlin, Martin, etc. and educate yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael&#8217;s response to Michael Hardesty is riddled with errors from start to finish. There was never any Nazi plot to take over the world. The Soviets had lost ten times as much land to the Poles as the Germans at Versailles so they had their own interest in settling scores. It was never a plot with the Germans to divide Poland, both sides distrusted one another.<br />
The Sudenten Germans had lived in those areas hundreds of years before there was a united Germany so your attempted rationale for their expulsion of 15 million and murder of 2-3 million fails.<br />
The bogus plan you listed to divide up the world between the Germans and the Soviets never existed.<br />
You need to read the works that Hardesty recommended starting with A.J.P. Taylor&#8217;s The Origins Of The Second World War. The Nazi foreign policy was strictly limited to recovering German populated territories<br />
taken by the vengeful Versailles Treaty, the four foreign policy crises of the Rhineland, Austria, Sudentenland and Poland confirm this.<br />
The Japanese had been trying to surrender for six months prior to the bombing, see the Barnes piece in the May 10, 1958 National Review and the Gar Alperowiz book. Your statement that they had no concept of surrender is racist gibberish. Eisenhower and MacArthur and others said there never would have a US invasion of Japan. They would have been blockaded in the worst case but that was not necessary as they had been trying to surrender long before the militarily unjustified atomic war crimes.<br />
The creamatoriums existed and had nothing to do with any gas chambers, they were necessary because of the huge mortality rate from typhus and other diseases particularly in the last 18 months of the war. Had nothing to do with any mass extermination policy, again check out Debating The Holocaust by Thomas Dalton, Rassinier, Mattogno, Rudolph, Faurisson, Graf, Butz and other revisionists.<br />
Go to the CODOH or IHR or VHO websites to get an alternative view to the standard sources you mindlessly parrot.<br />
Many of us Jews think Thomas was on the money, her real frustration was with AIPAC control of the whole US political structure. If at least many of the Jews did leave the region would be better off. Her censure was the usual mindless Israel First idiots. Even if she over spoke she was right in essentials.<br />
It was only the UK and France who made the unwarranted and untenable pledge to Poland that turned a local conflict into a world war exactly as the Brits did in 1914.<br />
Hitler ONLY attacked the Low Countries to get to France before France attacked the same countries first to get to Germany.<br />
Ergo with Norway, Churchill admitted that the Germans beat them to the punch which is why the Allied claim of aggressive war by  Germany at Nuremberg was total hypocrisy.<br />
Franklin, an attack on a military facility like Pearl Harbor is totally different than obliterating a civilian population at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Not even a close call morally.<br />
The Germans never sent out colonies everywhere, Michael. It was the Brits and the French and the Spanish and the Dutch and the Belgians that conquered most of the world outside Europe. The Germans had one African colony which Hitler was never interested in getting back. Hitler also wrote off the Alsace-Lorraine. Your pipe dream of Germany, Japan and Italy dividing the world is a concocted big lie on a par with Roosevelt&#8217;s &#8216;secret map&#8217; of an alleged Nazi plot to take over Latin America. Utter hogwash !<br />
Japan was no more imperialistic in Asia than the West which actually stole most of the territory.<br />
Check out Hardesty&#8217;s recommendations on Barnes, Taylor, Beard, Tansill, Chamberlin, Martin, etc. and educate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-731033</link>
		<dc:creator>newson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-731033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ouch! the third rail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ouch! the third rail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beefcake the Mighty</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-730037</link>
		<dc:creator>Beefcake the Mighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-730037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[newson, 

Interesting, I did notice the other day that several comments here were deleted.  Curious indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>newson, </p>
<p>Interesting, I did notice the other day that several comments here were deleted.  Curious indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-730031</link>
		<dc:creator>newson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-730031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to beefcake the mighty:
in hindsight, your comment looks wise, and mine naive. pity your earlier comment was made to vanish. not a good look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to beefcake the mighty:<br />
in hindsight, your comment looks wise, and mine naive. pity your earlier comment was made to vanish. not a good look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis J. Aceto</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-704166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis J. Aceto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-704166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the proper stand someone who believes in any concept of justice should take on Israel should be to give back all the land that was stolen at the creation of the State. I understand not all the land was stolen but I also understand that most was.
Too many libertarians apply libertarian principles evenly except for one case; Israel.
In the JLS I believe there is a paper claiming that around 11 percent of the land of current Israel was not taken by force. So Helen Thomas&#039; comment that they should leave should be understood in that context. I am pretty sure she meant they should leave the land they stole not that they should all be expelled from legitimate property. 
Leading up to the creation of Israel there was a huge amount of terrorism perpetrated against villages who stood on land which Zionists had their eyes on and it has not stopped since.
Also, as an anarchist, I think the state of Israel should be peacefully dismantled. In agreement with many Hasidic Jews.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the proper stand someone who believes in any concept of justice should take on Israel should be to give back all the land that was stolen at the creation of the State. I understand not all the land was stolen but I also understand that most was.<br />
Too many libertarians apply libertarian principles evenly except for one case; Israel.<br />
In the JLS I believe there is a paper claiming that around 11 percent of the land of current Israel was not taken by force. So Helen Thomas&#8217; comment that they should leave should be understood in that context. I am pretty sure she meant they should leave the land they stole not that they should all be expelled from legitimate property.<br />
Leading up to the creation of Israel there was a huge amount of terrorism perpetrated against villages who stood on land which Zionists had their eyes on and it has not stopped since.<br />
Also, as an anarchist, I think the state of Israel should be peacefully dismantled. In agreement with many Hasidic Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-697524</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 07:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-697524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, despite the fact, that most of the article is really good, tha author didn&#039;t manage to stay honest to the end. We are talking about war, something we wouldn&#039;t be able to imagine no matter how many books we will read. The war creates tragedies, mass murders and other unbelievable evils. It is the sin of all mankind, everyone is in some way responsible for thing, which happend then. I don&#039;t see point in continual blames that nations throw at each other. 
Author stated that we can&#039;t forget about the crimes made on Germans at the end of war and point at Czech, Poles and Russians as those who sholud be blamed. But did those nations have any other choice? They were also replaced from the East of their countries. Most of its East regions were taken from Poland, where people from there should go to? There is no simple ansewers for events happenning 70years ago and we will never understand them. 

The tragedy was everywhere and affected every ordinary person. It&#039;s the truth of these times. We should do everything to prevent it from happening in future, nothing else, blames won&#039;t help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, despite the fact, that most of the article is really good, tha author didn&#8217;t manage to stay honest to the end. We are talking about war, something we wouldn&#8217;t be able to imagine no matter how many books we will read. The war creates tragedies, mass murders and other unbelievable evils. It is the sin of all mankind, everyone is in some way responsible for thing, which happend then. I don&#8217;t see point in continual blames that nations throw at each other.<br />
Author stated that we can&#8217;t forget about the crimes made on Germans at the end of war and point at Czech, Poles and Russians as those who sholud be blamed. But did those nations have any other choice? They were also replaced from the East of their countries. Most of its East regions were taken from Poland, where people from there should go to? There is no simple ansewers for events happenning 70years ago and we will never understand them. </p>
<p>The tragedy was everywhere and affected every ordinary person. It&#8217;s the truth of these times. We should do everything to prevent it from happening in future, nothing else, blames won&#8217;t help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693254</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crematoria certainly worked and were in use. There is some question as to whether the gas chambers had actually gone on line by the time the Allies showed up. Here&#039;s some useful info:

&quot;Given the evidence that confronted them, it was not surprising that soldiers, observers, journalists and Congressional investigators should have assumed that the bodies found in the mortuary, on the floor of the gas chamber, and next to the old crematorium had been victims of the gas chamber. A report in a U.S. Army newspaper of the time reported:

&quot;The Dachau crematorium is a long low brick structure with a tall smokestack from which smoke poured day and night. The gas chamber is 20 feet square and has 18 nozzles across the ceiling that look like shower outlets... 32

&quot;It is generally accepted today that most, if not all of the dead found in these areas, perished through starvation, exposure, sickness -- particularly typhus -- mistreatment, and execution by means other than poison gas. Nonetheless, one survivor of the Dachau camp, Joel Sack, a Polish engineer, who visited the homicidal chamber soon after liberation reports:

&quot;Outside, there was still a plentiful supply of cans with the Zyclon-B [sic] poison. The cans bore the name of the manufacturer, A.E.G. [sic] FARBEN INDUSTRIE

&quot;To the outside of the gas chamber door were attached forms for keeping records:

&quot;Gasheit, Time of gassing. Zu, Close . . . Uhr, Time ...

&quot;Auf, Finish . . . Uhr, Time . . .

&quot;Below that was the sign of a skull with two cross bones and a warning:

&quot;Vorsicht, Careful . . . G A S

&quot;Lebensgefahr, Danger to Life

&quot;Nicht Offenen, Do Not Open 33

&quot;Neither the reports by the U.S. Army, Father Hess nor Sack prove conclusively that the homicidal chamber was used to kill people. Until further evidence is discovered, historians will have to conform themselves with the knowledge that it was technically possible to have murdered human beings with poison gas in that room, and that the room, some 16x16x12ft high, was designed for the exclusive purpose of carrying out such a grim task.&quot; etcetera

http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crematoria certainly worked and were in use. There is some question as to whether the gas chambers had actually gone on line by the time the Allies showed up. Here&#8217;s some useful info:</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the evidence that confronted them, it was not surprising that soldiers, observers, journalists and Congressional investigators should have assumed that the bodies found in the mortuary, on the floor of the gas chamber, and next to the old crematorium had been victims of the gas chamber. A report in a U.S. Army newspaper of the time reported:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Dachau crematorium is a long low brick structure with a tall smokestack from which smoke poured day and night. The gas chamber is 20 feet square and has 18 nozzles across the ceiling that look like shower outlets&#8230; 32</p>
<p>&#8220;It is generally accepted today that most, if not all of the dead found in these areas, perished through starvation, exposure, sickness &#8212; particularly typhus &#8212; mistreatment, and execution by means other than poison gas. Nonetheless, one survivor of the Dachau camp, Joel Sack, a Polish engineer, who visited the homicidal chamber soon after liberation reports:</p>
<p>&#8220;Outside, there was still a plentiful supply of cans with the Zyclon-B [sic] poison. The cans bore the name of the manufacturer, A.E.G. [sic] FARBEN INDUSTRIE</p>
<p>&#8220;To the outside of the gas chamber door were attached forms for keeping records:</p>
<p>&#8220;Gasheit, Time of gassing. Zu, Close . . . Uhr, Time &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Auf, Finish . . . Uhr, Time . . .</p>
<p>&#8220;Below that was the sign of a skull with two cross bones and a warning:</p>
<p>&#8220;Vorsicht, Careful . . . G A S</p>
<p>&#8220;Lebensgefahr, Danger to Life</p>
<p>&#8220;Nicht Offenen, Do Not Open 33</p>
<p>&#8220;Neither the reports by the U.S. Army, Father Hess nor Sack prove conclusively that the homicidal chamber was used to kill people. Until further evidence is discovered, historians will have to conform themselves with the knowledge that it was technically possible to have murdered human beings with poison gas in that room, and that the room, some 16x16x12ft high, was designed for the exclusive purpose of carrying out such a grim task.&#8221; etcetera</p>
<p><a href="http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693224</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at dachau in1972. I distinctly remember reading that the crematoriums, though built were never used. It was right there on a plate next to the ovens themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at dachau in1972. I distinctly remember reading that the crematoriums, though built were never used. It was right there on a plate next to the ovens themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693195</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You say &quot;This week, Helen Thomas stated the far left conviction (silence from White House defining approval), heretofore kept mute under the rug, that Jews have no legitimate place in Israel or the Middle East.&quot;

In reality this has been the official response: &quot;The final shove out the door came after a denunciation from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who called her statements &quot;offensive and reprehensible.&quot;

&quot;Gibbs added that her remarks &quot;do not reflect certainly the opinion of most of the people here and certainly not of the administration.&quot;

&quot;Thomas was also denounced by the White House Correspondents Association, which said it was considering whether to boot her from her customary front-row seat at the White House press room.&quot;

So I would say she&#039;s been promptly censured and chastised, both by the White House and by the press association. Additionally, I would offer that this is very far from the standard left view of Israel. No one anywhere on the left, from Hamas and Hezbollah to ordinary liberals and progressives here, is saying the Jews should get out of the Middle East. Instead what everyone is saying is that Israel should become like every other civilized nation, and extend full citizenship and civil rights to every ethnicity living inside its borders. What we all object to is their categorization of the world into members of the Jewish nation (good) and a subject race with no rights, including neither life nor property.

The divide, pretty much, is between people who believe in a two-state solution, with independent Israel and Palestine living side by side, and a single-state solution (my preference) in which everyone learns to live together in a unified Israel-Palestine, and all enjoy the same rights and privileges under law.

The State of Israel likes neither approach, preferring to follow a pre-1945 notion that the master race should do whatever it wants without the need to consult the people being ruled. It&#039;s very out of fashion, and corrosive to the movement toward world peace.

Israel, stay right where you are. But please, don&#039;t stay &#039;just the way&#039; you are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;This week, Helen Thomas stated the far left conviction (silence from White House defining approval), heretofore kept mute under the rug, that Jews have no legitimate place in Israel or the Middle East.&#8221;</p>
<p>In reality this has been the official response: &#8220;The final shove out the door came after a denunciation from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who called her statements &#8220;offensive and reprehensible.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Gibbs added that her remarks &#8220;do not reflect certainly the opinion of most of the people here and certainly not of the administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Thomas was also denounced by the White House Correspondents Association, which said it was considering whether to boot her from her customary front-row seat at the White House press room.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I would say she&#8217;s been promptly censured and chastised, both by the White House and by the press association. Additionally, I would offer that this is very far from the standard left view of Israel. No one anywhere on the left, from Hamas and Hezbollah to ordinary liberals and progressives here, is saying the Jews should get out of the Middle East. Instead what everyone is saying is that Israel should become like every other civilized nation, and extend full citizenship and civil rights to every ethnicity living inside its borders. What we all object to is their categorization of the world into members of the Jewish nation (good) and a subject race with no rights, including neither life nor property.</p>
<p>The divide, pretty much, is between people who believe in a two-state solution, with independent Israel and Palestine living side by side, and a single-state solution (my preference) in which everyone learns to live together in a unified Israel-Palestine, and all enjoy the same rights and privileges under law.</p>
<p>The State of Israel likes neither approach, preferring to follow a pre-1945 notion that the master race should do whatever it wants without the need to consult the people being ruled. It&#8217;s very out of fashion, and corrosive to the movement toward world peace.</p>
<p>Israel, stay right where you are. But please, don&#8217;t stay &#8216;just the way&#8217; you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693133</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael-- I doubt this will have any effect on your thinking, but you make a number of essential errors in this analysis:

&quot;Hitler never had conquest plans against the West. His focus was entirely on regaining German territories. If he had any imperialist pretensions and the record doesn’t show that, then it would have been towards the USSR, certainly nothing for the West to deplore. France and the UK declared war on Germany because of a totally untenable pledge to Poland, which they knew couldn’t be fulfilled at the time they made it and in fact when the USSR took the eastern half of Poland Churchill &amp; Co. said their pledge didn’t apply to that part of Poland ! So much for “defense” against aggression.&quot;

Diplomatic alliances had been the norm for centuries in Europe. However in this instance it had become obvious by mid-September, 1939 that France had informed Poland they could not rush to her defense in the case of invasion. The Germans knew this. So as soon as the ink had dried on Molotov-Ribbentrop, the tanks marched across Poland from either direction. And while the Soviets were mopping up the Baltic states, Hitler&#039;s panzers were securing their side of the line. The plan included dividing up the world into spheres, where Germany would occupy everything from Hungary and the Balkans out to India. Italy would get Africa. Japan would get China, SE Asia and the Pacific Rim. Etcetera.

Then Hitler invaded the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway and France. Did all those countries also pledge themselves to attack Germany? Britain was supposed to surrender, which they did not-- so the Battle for Britain proceeded.

None of those nations, from Britain out to the Indian Ocean, were former German territory to the best of my knowledge. What they were were lands occupied by the untermenschen, people fit only to be slaves.

And if we complain about the Sudetenland only having been part of a country cobbled together in 1920, we should keep in mind that Germany itself was only invented in 1871, a mere 50 years earlier. Whereas the Kingdom of Bohemia (historically Slavic since the sixth century) had been part of the Austrian Empire since 1526. See Wikipedia on this.

The history of Europe is one of mixed populations where one ethnicity is temporarily on top and all the others feel like they&#039;re getting the shaft. The Germans had sent colonies out nearly everywhere, from central Russia around Orenburg to Transylvania, through what became Yugoslavia and the Alps. That doesn&#039;t mean they enjoyed the sole right to rule such places, and to kill off populations like the Ukrainians, Poles and Jews so they could have more room for themselves.

I do have that book by Alperowitz, Atomic Diplomacy, and on your recommendation will pick it up again for a closer look. But if you recall what we knew back in 1945, it was that Japan had no culture of surrender. In fact our prisoners were mistreated so brutally because they had no respect for any soldier who permitted himself to be captured. You were supposed to die fighting.

That means that even though the writing was on the wall, they were prepared to fight to the last man defending the Japanese Empire. Estimates were that we could lose up to a quarter million soldiers trying to secure Kyushu, Shikoku, Honshu and the hundreds of smaller islands. A good case can even be made that fighting our way up the archipelago, one kilometer at a time, would have resulted in the loss of more Japanese civilians than the two bomb drops claimed.

It was a very dirty war. All sides committed atrocities. But we should allow first blame to go to the aggressors, the citizens of a defeated and angry Germany who followed Hitler in his crusade to conquer the world. Plus, of course, Stalin, Tojo and Mussolini, for entering into an agreement to divide up the loot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael&#8211; I doubt this will have any effect on your thinking, but you make a number of essential errors in this analysis:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hitler never had conquest plans against the West. His focus was entirely on regaining German territories. If he had any imperialist pretensions and the record doesn’t show that, then it would have been towards the USSR, certainly nothing for the West to deplore. France and the UK declared war on Germany because of a totally untenable pledge to Poland, which they knew couldn’t be fulfilled at the time they made it and in fact when the USSR took the eastern half of Poland Churchill &amp; Co. said their pledge didn’t apply to that part of Poland ! So much for “defense” against aggression.&#8221;</p>
<p>Diplomatic alliances had been the norm for centuries in Europe. However in this instance it had become obvious by mid-September, 1939 that France had informed Poland they could not rush to her defense in the case of invasion. The Germans knew this. So as soon as the ink had dried on Molotov-Ribbentrop, the tanks marched across Poland from either direction. And while the Soviets were mopping up the Baltic states, Hitler&#8217;s panzers were securing their side of the line. The plan included dividing up the world into spheres, where Germany would occupy everything from Hungary and the Balkans out to India. Italy would get Africa. Japan would get China, SE Asia and the Pacific Rim. Etcetera.</p>
<p>Then Hitler invaded the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway and France. Did all those countries also pledge themselves to attack Germany? Britain was supposed to surrender, which they did not&#8211; so the Battle for Britain proceeded.</p>
<p>None of those nations, from Britain out to the Indian Ocean, were former German territory to the best of my knowledge. What they were were lands occupied by the untermenschen, people fit only to be slaves.</p>
<p>And if we complain about the Sudetenland only having been part of a country cobbled together in 1920, we should keep in mind that Germany itself was only invented in 1871, a mere 50 years earlier. Whereas the Kingdom of Bohemia (historically Slavic since the sixth century) had been part of the Austrian Empire since 1526. See Wikipedia on this.</p>
<p>The history of Europe is one of mixed populations where one ethnicity is temporarily on top and all the others feel like they&#8217;re getting the shaft. The Germans had sent colonies out nearly everywhere, from central Russia around Orenburg to Transylvania, through what became Yugoslavia and the Alps. That doesn&#8217;t mean they enjoyed the sole right to rule such places, and to kill off populations like the Ukrainians, Poles and Jews so they could have more room for themselves.</p>
<p>I do have that book by Alperowitz, Atomic Diplomacy, and on your recommendation will pick it up again for a closer look. But if you recall what we knew back in 1945, it was that Japan had no culture of surrender. In fact our prisoners were mistreated so brutally because they had no respect for any soldier who permitted himself to be captured. You were supposed to die fighting.</p>
<p>That means that even though the writing was on the wall, they were prepared to fight to the last man defending the Japanese Empire. Estimates were that we could lose up to a quarter million soldiers trying to secure Kyushu, Shikoku, Honshu and the hundreds of smaller islands. A good case can even be made that fighting our way up the archipelago, one kilometer at a time, would have resulted in the loss of more Japanese civilians than the two bomb drops claimed.</p>
<p>It was a very dirty war. All sides committed atrocities. But we should allow first blame to go to the aggressors, the citizens of a defeated and angry Germany who followed Hitler in his crusade to conquer the world. Plus, of course, Stalin, Tojo and Mussolini, for entering into an agreement to divide up the loot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693085</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 04:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David, as soon as you can logically explain to me why I should accept your particular religious beliefs as absolute truth (rather than accepting every other of the thousands of religions) you can call me a child for not believing.

Why are you a Christian (I assume)? Why not Muslim? Their book tells them it is true just as much as yours tells you. Why aren&#039;t you a Buddhist? Do you worship the ancient Roman gods? There is no logical way to decide which religion is right, so how can you possibly take your religion on faith while refusing to have faith in Vishnu? 

I hope you can explain it to me, because I sure can&#039;t figure it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, as soon as you can logically explain to me why I should accept your particular religious beliefs as absolute truth (rather than accepting every other of the thousands of religions) you can call me a child for not believing.</p>
<p>Why are you a Christian (I assume)? Why not Muslim? Their book tells them it is true just as much as yours tells you. Why aren&#8217;t you a Buddhist? Do you worship the ancient Roman gods? There is no logical way to decide which religion is right, so how can you possibly take your religion on faith while refusing to have faith in Vishnu? </p>
<p>I hope you can explain it to me, because I sure can&#8217;t figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693075</link>
		<dc:creator>newson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this wasn&#039;t just a crematorium. the gas chamber was built, just not properly, so never worked.  but there were those appalling &quot;medical&quot; experiments.  and some thirty thousand died in dachau. working someone to death, or freezing them to death in some cruel lab experiment is no different from gassing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this wasn&#8217;t just a crematorium. the gas chamber was built, just not properly, so never worked.  but there were those appalling &#8220;medical&#8221; experiments.  and some thirty thousand died in dachau. working someone to death, or freezing them to death in some cruel lab experiment is no different from gassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693074</link>
		<dc:creator>newson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m certain you have; i&#039;m surprised you have such an optimistic outlook. i see no new man, only new technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m certain you have; i&#8217;m surprised you have such an optimistic outlook. i see no new man, only new technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693066</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;....he would present dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima as comparable to the attack on Pearl Harbor...&quot;

if I were vaporized while eating my lunch on a Hiroshima sidewalk when the bomb hit, or I was obliterated while walking to the Pearl Harbor commissary to buy a sandwich for a relative I was visiting when the attack occurred,  I think I&#039;d probably feel they were comparable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.he would present dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima as comparable to the attack on Pearl Harbor&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>if I were vaporized while eating my lunch on a Hiroshima sidewalk when the bomb hit, or I was obliterated while walking to the Pearl Harbor commissary to buy a sandwich for a relative I was visiting when the attack occurred,  I think I&#8217;d probably feel they were comparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693017</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But, wasn’t Dachau one of the camps in the West, where even mainstream historians concur that no exterminations took place..?

Not really. Here&#039;s a link to a description of the killing that took place in Dachau, along with some pictures of the gas chambers there:

http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/

High-end estimates of the number of the gassed range around a quarter million people. If that doesn&#039;t quite qualify as being an &#039;extermination&#039; camp, the distinction is purely semantic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But, wasn’t Dachau one of the camps in the West, where even mainstream historians concur that no exterminations took place..?</p>
<p>Not really. Here&#8217;s a link to a description of the killing that took place in Dachau, along with some pictures of the gas chambers there:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.holocaust-history.org/dachau-gas-chambers/</a></p>
<p>High-end estimates of the number of the gassed range around a quarter million people. If that doesn&#8217;t quite qualify as being an &#8216;extermination&#8217; camp, the distinction is purely semantic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-693013</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-693013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of points. First you say &quot;It was precisely the immoral and illegal Czech occupation of the Sudentenland which brought on the Munich conference. 

Czechoslovakia was an artificial state created by the unjust Versailles Treaty.&quot;Not really. The Sudeten territories had been part of a multi-ethnic empire for centuries-- Austria-Hungary. Germans lived there, as they did in the Bachka, in western Hungary and in Transylvania. So did lots of other ethnicities.

These lands were transferred by international agreement to a new authority. And ethnic Germans were not mistreated by the Czechs. Quite the opposite, in fact. Then the land was gobbled up by the familiar process of invasion and occupation. It was an act of predation, not one with any legal justification.

At the end of Germany&#039;s attempt to kill the populations of Eastern Europe and take their land, there was quite a lot of retaliation. Bloody and lawless, certainly. But I think, in light of the events of 1939-45, understandable. Several million Germans living in Poland, Czechoslovakia and elsewhere were forcibly removed, with accompanying atrocities.

To say that one side was blameless and the other totally in the wrong would be to misread history. Which brings me to this:

&quot;Since many more Germans were killed during AND after the war than Jews your right that there is no comparison.

&quot;Holocaust denial isn&#039;t pretty, nor is it fashionable. What you seem to be peddling is the idea that if the Germans hatched a plan and proceeded to coldly murder 12-15,000,000 Jewish, Rom and Slavic civilians (Hugh Trevor-Roper gives 13 million), it&#039;s no big deal. THEY killed more of US in retaliation!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points. First you say &#8220;It was precisely the immoral and illegal Czech occupation of the Sudentenland which brought on the Munich conference. </p>
<p>Czechoslovakia was an artificial state created by the unjust Versailles Treaty.&#8221;Not really. The Sudeten territories had been part of a multi-ethnic empire for centuries&#8211; Austria-Hungary. Germans lived there, as they did in the Bachka, in western Hungary and in Transylvania. So did lots of other ethnicities.</p>
<p>These lands were transferred by international agreement to a new authority. And ethnic Germans were not mistreated by the Czechs. Quite the opposite, in fact. Then the land was gobbled up by the familiar process of invasion and occupation. It was an act of predation, not one with any legal justification.</p>
<p>At the end of Germany&#8217;s attempt to kill the populations of Eastern Europe and take their land, there was quite a lot of retaliation. Bloody and lawless, certainly. But I think, in light of the events of 1939-45, understandable. Several million Germans living in Poland, Czechoslovakia and elsewhere were forcibly removed, with accompanying atrocities.</p>
<p>To say that one side was blameless and the other totally in the wrong would be to misread history. Which brings me to this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Since many more Germans were killed during AND after the war than Jews your right that there is no comparison.</p>
<p>&#8220;Holocaust denial isn&#8217;t pretty, nor is it fashionable. What you seem to be peddling is the idea that if the Germans hatched a plan and proceeded to coldly murder 12-15,000,000 Jewish, Rom and Slavic civilians (Hugh Trevor-Roper gives 13 million), it&#8217;s no big deal. THEY killed more of US in retaliation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Albin</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-692999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Albin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-692999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is interesting.  I&#039;ve been to Dachau, and I came away with the impression that mass killings took place there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is interesting.  I&#8217;ve been to Dachau, and I came away with the impression that mass killings took place there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beefcake the Mighty</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-692994</link>
		<dc:creator>Beefcake the Mighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-692994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What mass killings occured at Dachau?  I don&#039;t think anyone believes there were gas chambers at Dachau (except maybe Netanyahu);  I suppose there could have been shootings for various infractions.  If you are referring to the pile of emaciated corpses photographed when the western Allies liberated the camps, these photographs are certainly real, but they of course reflect the fact that conditions in the camps at the end of the war were absolutely atrocious, in no small part due to the fact that the Americans and British had bombed the German logistics/railway system into oblivion.  Under such circumstances, it is not surprising that these camp inmates (which as is well known consisted not just of Jews, but of other political prisoners and common criminals) would die in large numbers (and of course some of the bodies were disposed of by cremation).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What mass killings occured at Dachau?  I don&#8217;t think anyone believes there were gas chambers at Dachau (except maybe Netanyahu);  I suppose there could have been shootings for various infractions.  If you are referring to the pile of emaciated corpses photographed when the western Allies liberated the camps, these photographs are certainly real, but they of course reflect the fact that conditions in the camps at the end of the war were absolutely atrocious, in no small part due to the fact that the Americans and British had bombed the German logistics/railway system into oblivion.  Under such circumstances, it is not surprising that these camp inmates (which as is well known consisted not just of Jews, but of other political prisoners and common criminals) would die in large numbers (and of course some of the bodies were disposed of by cremation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-692965</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-692965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s way past time that many more articles like this appear. For more than sixty years we&#039;ve been virtually force-fed a daily diet of &quot;holocaust&quot; in the mainstream media with rarely a mention of any other groups who&#039;ve suffered far worse. It&#039;s even more rarely mentioned  that Hitlers&#039; prime motivation was to save the white race. If anyone cares from the figures I can find the world percentage of whites has dropped from about 29% a hundred years ago to something less than 10% now. I see more coverage being given to obscure species of rats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s way past time that many more articles like this appear. For more than sixty years we&#8217;ve been virtually force-fed a daily diet of &#8220;holocaust&#8221; in the mainstream media with rarely a mention of any other groups who&#8217;ve suffered far worse. It&#8217;s even more rarely mentioned  that Hitlers&#8217; prime motivation was to save the white race. If anyone cares from the figures I can find the world percentage of whites has dropped from about 29% a hundred years ago to something less than 10% now. I see more coverage being given to obscure species of rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newson</title>
		<link>http://archive.mises.org/12889/the-taboo-against-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-692957</link>
		<dc:creator>newson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mises.org/?p=12889#comment-692957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no. mass killings commenced there from 1941.  (the numbers are less than than the eastern camps, but my point is that you can&#039;t incinerate tens of thousands and have the air smelling like lily of the valley. the town folk knew.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no. mass killings commenced there from 1941.  (the numbers are less than than the eastern camps, but my point is that you can&#8217;t incinerate tens of thousands and have the air smelling like lily of the valley. the town folk knew.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 10/42 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 640/675 objects using apc

 Served from: archive.mises.org @ 2013-06-20 02:42:31 by W3 Total Cache -->