1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar
Source link: http://archive.mises.org/11221/the-left-fell-into-the-climate-morass/

The Left Fell into the Climate Morass

December 11, 2009 by

Instead of working against war and the police state, instincts were diverted to the preposterous cause of creating a statist system for global thermometer management. FULL ARTICLE by Lew Rockwell


Gray Shambler December 12, 2009 at 4:24 am


E.T. Daniel December 13, 2009 at 11:10 am

Clearly, the ‘end game’ of the ‘collective’ Left – no matter what name is utilized, i.e., Green, Red, Progressive, Liberal, Egalitarian, Socialist, Communist, Fascist, etc., the ultimate goal is complete control of the “means of production” – land labor and capital – on a global scale.

“Social Justice”; the “common good” and “fairness; coupled with ‘global warming’, aka climate change, are the mechanisms which will seal the fate of the “fragile experiment with freedom” Ben Franklin spoke of.

TokyoTom December 20, 2009 at 3:20 am

Lew, I think most of your criticism of the left and of environmentalists is apt, but “libertarians” have only to look in the mirror to see someone to blame for the lack of productive discourse on environmental and regulatory issues, and the reason why libertarians are being marginalized in the confused debate over the legitimate role of the state.

Libertarians in general continue to:

- ignore the opportunities created by widespread concerns about climate change risks to partner with both left and right to seek to undo counterproductive state/federal regulation:

- refuse to follow-up on their own analyses to dig more deeply to see that the roots of the disastrous cycle of regulation (and snowballing fights over the wheel of government) lie in the grant of limited liability to corporate investors, and the resulting externalization of risk and undermining of common law property protections:

- as Ed Dolan suggested, continue to act as the “conservatives” that Hayek despised by refusing to question the legitimacy of the favors provided to statist enterprises under the status quo, and turn a blind eye to the direct role that “libertarians” play in the gamesmanship such enterprises continue (such questions of motives being “ad homs” except when addressed to alarmists, in whch case it is “cui bono”):

- instead of acknowledging the legitimacy of concerns over man`s onslaught on nature and local communities (arising both from a lack of property rights problem and from the hand of kleptocratic governments) prefer a self-comforting irrelevancy, both on climate and on resource issues generally:

- rather than honest engagement, prefer a tribal hatred of misanthropic “watermelons” and a smug love of ad-homs:

Time for some more self-satisfied, but ultimately empty tribal holiday cheer?




Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: