Comments on: EXCLUSIVE: FTC Illegally Published Elderly Couple’s Financial Information

By: Texas Shredding

Texas Shredding — Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:07:24 +0000

This is a good example of how security breaches can happen even from unexpected sources. This is why it is important for people to take measures to protect their privacy and their personal information whether they are stored online, in a hard drive or in files at your home. Businesses such as Lifelock, applications like The Knowledge Tree and records destruction companies offer services that can protect your personal and business information. Operating a Texas shredding company, we help companies and households destroy their records and paper waste in a secure manner.

By: Friedrich Dominicus

Friedrich Dominicus — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:29:05 +0000

Isn’t it as usual? Monopols at work?

By: The End Is Near – Under Penalty of Catapult

The End Is Near – Under Penalty of Catapult — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:26:17 +0000

[...] The Federal Trade Commission imposed a 20-year “consent order” on Twitter, claiming the company provided insufficient safeguards for consumers’ private information. No such rules apply to the FTC, which has a history of intentionally retaliating against individuals who refuse to sign consent orders by disclosing their private financial information. [...]

By: William H. Isely

William H. Isely — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:18 +0000

If Meldlinger or ayone else who knows let me know how they found out that my name and my wife’s as well as Matthew Van Horn’s and Judge D. Michael Chappell’s had been put on DHS’s terroist watch list. I thought this was a secret list not accessable to the public. It is curious that the only thing these people have in common is the FTC lawsuit Docket 9330. Maybe someone did not like the outsome and this is a grudge reaction. Bill Isely

By: William H. Isely

William H. Isely — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:23:02 +0000

I would like anyone, such as Meldlinger, to contact me about where he/she found out my name and my wife’s
had been added to the terrorist list. I am sure Judge
D. Michael Chappell would be interested to know as well. Maybe even Mathew Van Horn. The only thing we three have in common is the TFC case
Docket 9330. Appears to be a grudge reaction by someone who did not like the outcome of the trial?

By: Nate

Nate — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:35:43 +0000

“If approved by Judge Chappell, taxpayers would be on the hook for the full amount”

Even worse, if taxpayers try to petition their representatives over the lax standards at the FTC or the general illegality of the FTC, they are ignored. And if we try to withhold our funds, by way of taxes we’re jailed. What a wonderful thugocracy we live in.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:48:51 +0000

Thanks for posting. Will some experienced hackers out there please collect similar data on the top FTC people and release it? For once I’d like to see somebody ruin those bastard’s lives…

By: Christopher

Christopher — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:17:38 +0000

The FTC is one of the most abusive and unconstitutional (and, come to think of it, little-discussed) organizations in this country. They seem to delight in forcing small companies into bankrupcy with preposterous lawsuits and expensive, mandatory requests for data. It provides a classic example of the federal government granting an organization powers which it itself does not legally possess.

By: Jeffrey Tucker

Jeffrey Tucker — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:53:56 +0000

This is a remarkable thing. It is posted now at Reddit
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/adbfo/ftc_illegally_publishes_individuals_financial/