1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar
Source link: http://archive.mises.org/10645/passing-facts-on-the-end-of-progress/

Passing Facts on the End of Progress

September 11, 2009 by

Just a few observations from the latest Census report on Income in America.

  • Real median household income declined by 3.6 percent between 2007 and 2008, from $52,163 to $50,303, following 3 years of annual income increases (Figure 1, Table 1, and Appendix A). The decline in income coincides with the recession that started in December 2007.
  • Real median income declined for both family (3.3 percent) and non-family households (4.0 percent) between 2007 and 2008
  • Households of each race category and those of Hispanic origin had declines in real median income between 2007 and 2008
  • Native- and foreign-born households, including those maintained by a naturalized citizen, had declines in real median income between 2007 and 2008.6 Income remained statistically unchanged for households maintained by a noncitizen
  • The South, Midwest, and West regions experienced declines in real median household income between 2007 and 2008, while income in the Northeast remained statistically unchanged
  • Real median earnings of both men and women who worked full-time, year-round declined in 2008, following increases in 2007. Men’s earnings declined by 1.0 percent to $46,367 and women’s declined by 1.9 percent to $35,745.

This chart illustrates the issue. It comes down to no overall income increase in 10 years.

{ 6 comments }

asiancaucasian September 11, 2009 at 12:04 pm

What’s with the asians around 1999?

dewind September 11, 2009 at 12:38 pm

@asiancaucasian

Tech boom? ;-)

asiancaucasian September 11, 2009 at 1:28 pm

LOL

From 1999 to 2001 their income decreased about 15%.

9/11 anyone?

K Ackermann September 11, 2009 at 1:29 pm

And we pulled all that demand forward with easy credit. I have no idea if there is any meaningful information in the debt to GDP ratio because I have not seen what a “normal” number is.

The 2 times household debt reached 100% of GDP was 1929, and 2007, and that is what bothers me. We are only a year into the real teeth of this… whatever it is, and huge amounts of resources have been used to mitigate some aspects of it, but have done so using a policy of reflation.

The only way that I believe that policy works is by assuming that everything was at the correct level before the crisis. If it wasn’t, then we are making it worse. If there is any correlation to the GD, then we are only in the early innings, and we still ‘owe’ an even sharper correction.

What is driving capital formation right now? To me, it seems like a weak dollar is driving speculation, but that is just floating on air if there is no demand behind it.

If debt is the truth behind a large portion of the downturn, then reflation will do more harm than good. Additionally, it would mean we have large structural problems, as we are geared for consumption. We might literally be wired for failure.

Savings are climbing, but they are fighting the ZIRP. I’m watching corporate bonds closely. If the spreads stay flat or tighten, then money is getting to the right places. If they start to widen, get ready to pull the trigger on anything tied up in equities. The market has furious growth priced in, but I am blind to where it will come from.

Bryan Z September 12, 2009 at 9:20 am

I’m reading “Democracy: The God That Failed”. Seems like this information fits right into Hoppes theory.

Conservative Economics September 12, 2009 at 9:25 am

Those darn Asians always screw up the discrimination argument.

I do have one question – have individual incomes declined as well or just household income?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: