Thanks to Tom for the memory, the good old days. Jackie really did seem like the coolest SOB to ever shoot pool. Even as a little kid I couldn’t wait to see those chicks swinging those legs. I’ll take them anyday over Shakira contorting like Gumby and convulsing like Linda Blair in _The Exorcist_.
I digress.

I remember in the piece of dirty state propaganda called “Apollo 13,” they had one character who wasn’t all clean-cut and admirable like the rest. This guy was fat, sweaty, and — OMG! — smoked right there in the middle of the flight control center. The character, of course, was the one token “capitalist” in the crowd, the “please view this person as a bad guy” flunky from the company that made the Apollo engines. They even had a scene, after the course-correction burn the astronauts did, where they made sure to show how heartless the “capitalist” was — as everyone else on Earth was busy being concerned about the safety of those brave astronauts, this so-called creepy manufacturer was portrayed as being concerned only with the performance of the engine.

I think you’re overreacting here. I’ve watched the entire series and as a libertarian, I’m usually pretty sensitive to the Marxist/statist/anti-capitalist agenda as it tends to seep into much of popular entertainment. Watching Mad Men, I never got the sense that the writers were subtly pushing for a statist agenda, but I could be wrong.

In fact, it seems to be the opposite. Take for instance Peggy Olson. She is able to succeed in a very sexist environment because of her talent. To me, the show is saying: “women don’t need anti-discrimination laws, they just need to prove that they can do the work of men.” I think you’d have a point if she failed despite her obvious talent and hard work, but that isn’t the case.

Yes, things like smoking, excessive drinking, cars without seatbelts, etc., are dangerous. But can you point to any examples in the show when the state is called upon to tame these dangers?

Is it possible that you’re looking a little too hard to find the message you’re expecting to get from Hollywood?

Here is a link to some insight on the show.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204908604574332284143366134.html

I usually love your pieces and almost always agree with everything you say, but I am afraid we have to part ways with our analysis of MadMen.

First, as Pablo pointed out, the show actually has promoted Ayn Rand’s book Atlas Shrugged.

Second, if anything the show glorifies the smoking/drinking environmental and makes it seem glam and sexy. There are characters (eg Peggy Olson and Pete Campbell) who dont smoke and turn out to be very successful. This shows how before the smoking bans that those who didn’t smoke didn’t seem at all bothered by it, and in fact were able to out compete those who did smoke/drink for promotions.

Third, the attack against women int he workplace in also unfounded. Every woman in the series who has asserted herself (eg Peggy Olson) has been rewarded for it. The housewives of the show are also notably perceived to be less intelligent, showing that only stupid women would choose not to work for a living.

Fourth, there is an episode where Don Draper (the main character) is confronted by a group of pinko pot smoking commies. They bash him for being a “mad man” and he basically tells them to quit complaining and get a job.

There are many more examples I could use to make my point but I think you get the drift. In the end, the perception of the show is in the eye of the beholder. MadMen happens to be my favorite show and I think it does a good job at re-enacting the 60s era very objectively with no deliberate bias either way.
Third,

Didn’t we just deport Demjanjuk for being on the watchtower?

Lawyers should be like nightwatchmen, not KGB agents, sticking their noses into everything. Then again how else could we support 1.43 million lawyers in this country, one lawyer for every 209 people?

There are more lawyers than doctors. There are 853,000 doctors in the US. If we had 1.43 million doctors and 853,000 lawyers we’d be healthier and happier.

Corporations hire attorneys to collude with the State. Ask GE and the Pharmaceutical companies.

Just like you cannot blame the fellow on the watchtower at the concentration camp, you can’t blame us attorneys for making a living working the law. The State passes laws to enrich the few, that is true; but what defenses would you have, dear sir, if there were no attorneys to defend you?

Corporations hire attorneys to protect against the State. An imperfect situation, for sure, but perform a little counterfactual analysis and you’ll soon figure out that it could be a lot worse. A lot.”

Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Obama, Biden all have one thing in common. If we had more small business owners instead of parasitic lawyers in Congress, which consume wealth, but do not generate it, then we’d be a richer and happier country.

Apparently, Mr. Tucker doesn’t remember much about sixties culture. I doubt if he remembers watching newscasters smoke while doing their shows – or Jackie Gleason smoking AND drinking as the scantily clad June Taylor Dancers performed on his variety show.

If anything, Madmen shows that life went on and people prospered in a world without whining bowtied guys overly concerned with the behavior of others.

I completely agree!

“…Corporations hire attorneys to protect against the State….”

They also hire attorneys and lobbyists to get unearned benefits (corporate welfare) from the State. Big businesses tend not to favor free enterprise; they prefer to use the State to lock in the status quo.

Back to the topic of Mad Men… can’t you guys just watch TV shows for relaxation and escapism, like the rest of us? Must you subject every TV show to the libertarian version of Political Correctness Analysis? Damn, but that’s tedious!

HayeksHeroes

The rise of attorneys probably had as much to do with the restrictive society we live in today. As corporations grew, they needed an ever expanding legal depts. Law Schools popped up, but not everyone wanted to practice corporate law. All new areas of the law appeared. The fact is that the government can pass all the laws they want, but they don’t mean anything if they are not enforced. Lawyers became the enforcers because they saw how much money could be made. Billions were made off tobacco and sexual harassment. Are we any better off? I can’t date my secretary, I have to wait until five to get a drink and my clothes don’t smell of stale smoke.

Hey, buddy, you don’t drink until five or date your secretary because you choose not to. As a lawyer who has enjoyed professional closeness to staff and bacchanalian lunches that would make any madman blush, I can tell you that it is you, not lawyers, who have ruined things.

Just like you cannot blame the fellow on the watchtower at the concentration camp, you can’t blame us attorneys for making a living working the law. The State passes laws to enrich the few, that is true; but what defenses would you have, dear sir, if there were no attorneys to defend you?

Corporations hire attorneys to protect against the State. An imperfect situation, for sure, but perform a little counterfactual analysis and you’ll soon figure out that it could be a lot worse. A lot.

This is the reality of TV. Depictions of the past aren’t based on history, their based on earlier TV shows.