one of the most interesting and important of these acts, in my view, is the cestui que vie act of 1666, passed, like the federal reserve act, while everyone was looking the other way (yes, the great fire of london).

it’s a very short act and it can be difficult to understande it’s olde englishe but the essence of it is that all estates are presumed abandoned and as such are being held in trust under the administratorship of the state. it doesn’t directly say it but it is implied therefore that the administrator of the estate, should they step forward and claim that role, will then become the full and sole administration of such an estate. you might think, ‘surely it can’t be that simple’ but it actually is and i have seen evidence personally and testimony from numerous people who have been recently experimenting with this, it is most definitely true and has force at law and any judge who tries to overrule such a designation of the administrative role of a living estate can be properly declared incompetent and unfit to preside. believe me, the state’s lawyers all know it is true, they just can’t admit it on the record because that would mean violating their fifth amendment type right of non-incrimination.

so that’s one little part of the story, and obviously as it relates to estates, which is the trust structure implied in a living man or woman’s body of property (estate) and there is another one, obliquely related – birth registrations consist of the same essential elements of a deed for immovable property, a description of the equity that the title is in reference to. for a person it is, birth weight, eye colour, hair colour, gender, the parents’ names, and usually both foot and handprints. a land title usually contains a description of the location, shape and dimensions of the property.

so, i am posting this here because it seems obvious to me that the writer of the article is reasonably familiar with the laws of property and the principles involved, i have heard one person say that if you can find a title in one of the states i mentioned above, all of which amount to title held in trust by the state for the cestui que vie act ‘lost at see’ estates… that the process simply amounts to surveying the land that has this type of status, writing up a deed including the particulars of the land, having this surveying attested as being true and correct (sworn) by a notary public, and sealed, a certified copy of this original sealed deed held by the claimant, and the original filed into the lands registry claiming jurisdiction and from there at law any such claims of eminent domain are invalid and can be struck down by the administrator of the estate which this deed is held within.

of course they could send in the black helicopters and murder everyone and steal it back but i suspect that if this claim of title is properly published by the claimant after doing these things that any interested party who wanted to could have every single person responsible for the expropriation stripped of their titles and the government made liable for a massive theft and murder operation. there is a growing army of researchers out there who are all working as a distributed, decentralised whole who are working to have it such that no matter who they try to shut up there will always be someone willing to step up and lodge a complaint with the courts and force these people to explain their actions.